Skip to main content

Speak up for Transportation

Transportation is often blamed for many of the world’s ills and some of it is undeniable, such as 1.2 million road deaths a year or poor urban air quality shortening the lives of those with heart or lung problems. However, every incident has many contributing factors. Sometimes transport may indeed be the biggest contributor – but it is almost always the easiest target because it is always simpler to blame machines than people.
December 11, 2017 Read time: 2 mins
Transportation is often blamed for many of the world’s ills and some of it is undeniable, such as 1.2 million road deaths a year or poor urban air quality shortening the lives of those with heart or lung problems. However, every incident has many contributing factors. Sometimes transport may indeed be the biggest contributor – but it is almost always the easiest target because it is always simpler to blame machines than people.

Transport is not the ‘necessary evil’ many would have us believe – a necessity, yes, but evil, no.     

It is against this background that I am delighted that this issue carries so many potential solutions to these ills: products to counter road crashes and deaths – be they caused by distracted drivers or incidents in tunnels, new ways to monitor (and strategies to improve) urban air quality and new car-sharing methods which can cut congestion, costs and emissions.

Furthermore, there are projects to look at using electric vehicles to help counter the mismatch between electricity production and consumption, improvements in enabling disabled people to use public transport and trials of technology to help prevent pedestrians being struck by trains.

While there is still much work to be done, transportation itself has progressed far beyond simply moving people and goods around ‘at any cost’ and is becoming cleaner and safer, and will increasingly make a positive contribution to society in many other ways.  

So don’t let the naysayers go unchallenged. Speak up for a sector that is at the leading edge of so many advances.

Related Content

  • Making cars safer for vulnerable road users
    June 2, 2016
    Richard Cuerden considers measures to improve the safety of vulnerable road users. The competitive nature of the car market has seen an increase in protection for those travelling inside the vehicle and this is reflected in the casualty statistics -but the same does not apply to those outside the vehicle. And with current societal trends such as ageing populations, an increasing number of pedestrians and cyclists encouraged by environmental policies, this is an area that authorities such as the European Uni
  • Intelligence transport systems potential?
    February 25, 2013
    The world of intelligent transport systems can, it would seem, be just as beset by muddled thinking as any other sector. How else to interpret the baffling announcement in January by the US Federal Communications Commission (FCC) chairman Julius Genachowski that the FCC intends to open up almost 200MHz of spectrum in the 5GHz band to unlicensed users, starting almost immediately? As the FCC itself points out, this would be the largest block of unlicensed spectrum to be made available for Wi-Fi in nearly te
  • Re-timing traffic signals delivers cost benefits
    June 28, 2012
    Nashville's signal optimisation programme produced a stunning return on investment. Are those results exceptional? Could similar results be replicated in cities across the US and indeed the world? ITS International spoke to Chris Rhodes, P.E. of Kimley-Horn and Associates, project leader for the Nashville signal optimisation programme. "You have to bear in mind that with signal optimisation programmes you don't see, for instance, physical construction or new pieces of equipment on the roadside that someone
  • ITS advancement lays beyond benefit-cost analysis
    May 29, 2013
    Shelley Row, former Director of the US Department of Transportation’s ITS Joint Program Office, gives her views on the way forward for the industry. We, as intelligent transportation system (ITS) proponents and engineers, tend to be overly fixated on benefit-cost data. We want decisions to be made on logical grounds for which benefit-cost calculations are optimal. While benefit-cost data is necessary, it is not always sufficient. We can learn from our history where we see three broad groups of ITS deploymen