Skip to main content

SESA signs show flexibility

SES America has developed a new, more efficient way to display accurate travel times by collecting data directly from travel time providers such as Waze, TomTom or Google, eliminating the need to rely on a vast network of sensors deployed across a road network. "This is a new concept," said Philippe Perut, president, SES America. "Traditionally, large dynamic signs need to be connected to a larger system. We have a standalone sign that can operate independently. There's less risk and less investment for th
June 14, 2016 Read time: 2 mins
Emily Boissonneault of SESA
7846 SES America has developed a new, more efficient way to display accurate travel times by collecting data directly from travel time providers such as 6897 Waze, 1692 TomTom or 1691 Google, eliminating the need to rely on a vast network of sensors deployed across a road network.

"This is a new concept," said Philippe Perut, president, SES America. "Traditionally, large dynamic signs need to be connected to a larger system. We have a standalone sign that can operate independently. There's less risk and less investment for the city."

Relying on travel time providers allows secondary and rural roads to be covered as well as major arteries because times are typically calculated by users travelling over multiple routes rather than by vehicles passing pre-deployed sensors.

The DMS Connect solution is solar powered and can be deployed without software or roadside equipment.

Communication is done through cellular, fibre or another communication network, and the sign can also be turned into a DMS controller connected to a traffic management center (TMC) via NTCIP and display other messages sent by the TMC. "This is perfect for cities that don't want to invest in a large system," Perut said.

"It can cost hundreds of thousands of dollars to deploy a traditional system reliant on sensors. We can get that cost down to tens of thousands of dollars for the same coverage."

SES America is looking to find partners and transportation agencies to conduct trials of the technology in several metropolitan areas.

For more information on companies in this article

Related Content

  • Priority for safety and interoperability, need for DSRC
    July 18, 2012
    Justin McNew, Chief Technology Officer, Kapsch TrafficCom Inc., USA offers his opinion of where 5.9GHz DSRC technology will head in the coming years. The debate ranges back and forth over the most suitable technological solution for future tolling and charging in the US. However, the coming trend is common cooperative infrastructure: instrumented roads and vehicles with the capacity to communicate with each other over all manner of safety, mobility and traveller applications, many of which will involve fina
  • USDoT pilots show win-win potential for connected vehicles
    December 19, 2017
    Pete Goldin discovers the state of play with connected vehicles trials in the US and the impact of Hurricane Irma on Tampa’s pilot. The US Department of Transportation’s (USDoT’s) connected vehicle (CV) pilot sites have moved into phase 2 of the deployment programme– design, build, test and, maybe most importantly, collaborate.
  • GIS-based state of the art emergency response, damage recovery
    January 26, 2012
    The gecko is one of several members of the lizard family which demonstrate autotomy: the ability to re-grow a tail or some other appendage lost during a time of peril. The GITA's GECCo programme is looking to give US infrastructures much the same capability
  • Developments in urban traffic management and control
    February 1, 2012
    Mark Cartwright, Centaur Consulting, discusses developments in urban traffic management and control. Despite the concept of UTMC (Urban Traffic Management and Control) having been around for some years now, there remains a significant rump of confusion as to its relationship with its similar-sounding cousin UTC (Urban Traffic Control). To many people, the two are one and the same. However, this is not the case.