SESA signs show flexibility

SES America has developed a new, more efficient way to display accurate travel times by collecting data directly from travel time providers such as Waze, TomTom or Google, eliminating the need to rely on a vast network of sensors deployed across a road network. "This is a new concept," said Philippe Perut, president, SES America. "Traditionally, large dynamic signs need to be connected to a larger system. We have a standalone sign that can operate independently. There's less risk and less investment for th
June 14, 2016 Read time: 2 mins
Emily Boissonneault of SESA
7846 SES America has developed a new, more efficient way to display accurate travel times by collecting data directly from travel time providers such as 6897 Waze, 1692 TomTom or 1691 Google, eliminating the need to rely on a vast network of sensors deployed across a road network.

"This is a new concept," said Philippe Perut, president, SES America. "Traditionally, large dynamic signs need to be connected to a larger system. We have a standalone sign that can operate independently. There's less risk and less investment for the city."

Relying on travel time providers allows secondary and rural roads to be covered as well as major arteries because times are typically calculated by users travelling over multiple routes rather than by vehicles passing pre-deployed sensors.

The DMS Connect solution is solar powered and can be deployed without software or roadside equipment.

Communication is done through cellular, fibre or another communication network, and the sign can also be turned into a DMS controller connected to a traffic management center (TMC) via NTCIP and display other messages sent by the TMC. "This is perfect for cities that don't want to invest in a large system," Perut said.

"It can cost hundreds of thousands of dollars to deploy a traditional system reliant on sensors. We can get that cost down to tens of thousands of dollars for the same coverage."

SES America is looking to find partners and transportation agencies to conduct trials of the technology in several metropolitan areas.

For more information on companies in this article

Related Content

  • Hartford’s tailors winter maintenance on Esri’s GIS platform
    August 5, 2016
    The in-house winter maintenance and vehicle tracking system built by the Public Works Department in Hartford, Connecticut, coped with record snowfalls and cut costs too. When it comes to dealing with the effects of mother nature, transport agencies can find themselves in a lose-lose situation: criticised if the roads or rail lines are disrupted by snow, ice or floods for more than a few hours and lambasted for wasting money if the equipment and stockpiles put in place for a hard winter remain unused.
    Read More
  • Connected citizens boosts Boston’s traffic management
    March 30, 2017
    Data-derived traffic management is starting to show benefits as David Crawford discovers. The city of Boston has been facing growing congestion problems in its Seaport regeneration district, with the rate of commercial and residential growth threatening to overtake the capacity of the road network to respond.
    Read More
  • Real-world testing is needed in wake of VW emissions scandal, says expert
    November 18, 2015
    As vehicle manufacturers, regulators and governments around the world seek solutions to prevent another emissions cheating scandal similar to the Volkswagen case, a major vehicle emissions inspection company has compiled and analysed on-road emissions data indicating that emissions violations of vehicles under real-world driving conditions may well go far beyond VW diesels. Opus Inspection says a two-pronged approach that continuously monitors real-world emissions is the only effective remedy. Lothar Ge
    Read More
  • ITS advancement lays beyond benefit-cost analysis
    May 29, 2013
    Shelley Row, former Director of the US Department of Transportation’s ITS Joint Program Office, gives her views on the way forward for the industry. We, as intelligent transportation system (ITS) proponents and engineers, tend to be overly fixated on benefit-cost data. We want decisions to be made on logical grounds for which benefit-cost calculations are optimal. While benefit-cost data is necessary, it is not always sufficient. We can learn from our history where we see three broad groups of ITS deploymen
    Read More

Highlighted Content