Skip to main content

Navigating an uncertain 2017

There is no doubt that 2016 has seen some of the biggest political upheavals in recent times: The UK’s decision to leave the EU, America electing a non-politician – namely Donald Trump – as its president, an attempted coup in Turkey, Brazil’s president impeached… the list goes on.
December 6, 2016 Read time: 2 mins
There is no doubt that 2016 has seen some of the biggest political upheavals in recent times: The UK’s decision to leave the EU, America electing a non-politician – namely Donald Trump – as its president, an attempted coup in Turkey, Brazil’s president impeached… the list goes on.

For government departments, both national and local, the uncertainty this causes throws any non-committed spend into jeopardy and virtually paralyses the planning process while political direction, priorities and budgets are agreed. In the case of the UK and the EU (where France, Germany, Hungary and Slovenia have presidential elections and the Netherlands has a general election), this uncertainty could last years, not months.

The timing of such momentous upheavals could not be worse for the transport sector which is seeing its own ‘revolution’ in terms of increasing urbanisation and new travel options such as Mobility as a Service, along with technology changes like autonomous vehicles. For all those reasons and more, 2017 is going to be a particularly uncertain and challenging year for the global transportation sector.

But one thing remains certain; that people and goods will still need to travel and be transported efficiently. That fundamental necessity, along with a moral imperative to reduce the number of fatalities on the roads and railways, underpins everything the sector does and strives to achieve.

Those basic principles are unerring and do not change, regardless of which way the political winds are blowing. While the near future may be administratively difficult, focusing on those fundamental principles and ultimate goals will, perhaps, make those choppy waters a little easier to navigate.

Related Content

  • Is road user charging the first stop for congestion management?
    July 23, 2012
    David Hytch, Information Systems Director at the Greater Manchester Public Transport Executive, considers just where congestion pricing schemes should sit in transport planners' hierarchy of options for managing demand. On the face of it, Greater Manchester in England's proposed congestion charging scheme hit just about every sweet spot possible when it came to convincing the general public of the need for and benefits of such a venture. There was the promise from national government of almost £3bn-worth of
  • Slow development of Europe's road user charging
    April 24, 2013
    Delegates convened in Brussels for Europe’s 10th annual Road User Charging Conference in March, when both positive and negative developments came to light for advocates of more widespread introduction of RUC. Jon Masters reports. Goings on across Europe in recent months have again demonstrated how very sensitive road user charging (RUC) is politically. At the 10th annual Road User Charging Conference in Brussels at the beginning of March, a Danish delegation was notable for its absence, but Belgian governme
  • Theoretical limits
    February 27, 2012
    I'll take a punt that a few months ago not many outside those with some form of business or economics qualification had even heard of John Maynard Keynes and his ideas on governments' interventionist role in stimulating growth and stability.
  • Economic crisis needs non-partisan perspectives to stimulate growth
    February 2, 2012
    Kary Witt, President of the IBTTA and Pat Jones, Executive Director and CEO, talk about the need to put aside partisan perspectives in order to deal with the current economic crisis