Skip to main content

Navigating an uncertain 2017

There is no doubt that 2016 has seen some of the biggest political upheavals in recent times: The UK’s decision to leave the EU, America electing a non-politician – namely Donald Trump – as its president, an attempted coup in Turkey, Brazil’s president impeached… the list goes on.
December 6, 2016 Read time: 2 mins
There is no doubt that 2016 has seen some of the biggest political upheavals in recent times: The UK’s decision to leave the EU, America electing a non-politician – namely Donald Trump – as its president, an attempted coup in Turkey, Brazil’s president impeached… the list goes on.

For government departments, both national and local, the uncertainty this causes throws any non-committed spend into jeopardy and virtually paralyses the planning process while political direction, priorities and budgets are agreed. In the case of the UK and the EU (where France, Germany, Hungary and Slovenia have presidential elections and the Netherlands has a general election), this uncertainty could last years, not months.

The timing of such momentous upheavals could not be worse for the transport sector which is seeing its own ‘revolution’ in terms of increasing urbanisation and new travel options such as Mobility as a Service, along with technology changes like autonomous vehicles. For all those reasons and more, 2017 is going to be a particularly uncertain and challenging year for the global transportation sector.

But one thing remains certain; that people and goods will still need to travel and be transported efficiently. That fundamental necessity, along with a moral imperative to reduce the number of fatalities on the roads and railways, underpins everything the sector does and strives to achieve.

Those basic principles are unerring and do not change, regardless of which way the political winds are blowing. While the near future may be administratively difficult, focusing on those fundamental principles and ultimate goals will, perhaps, make those choppy waters a little easier to navigate.

Related Content

  • TRL answer key questions on urban traffic control
    March 21, 2014
    PC-based urban traffic control (UTC) continues to grow. Gavin Jackman, Head of Traffic and Software at TRL, looks forward. 1. PC-based urban traffic control is now very well established throughout the world. What have been the most significant developments or new features that have become available over the last two years? That’s a really interesting question because, from a software perspective, a few things are noticeable. Firstly, there are more players on the market – TRL’s Transyt Online, Imtech’s Imf
  • Are truck bans the wrong move in the battle for air quality
    June 29, 2016
    Low emission zones and heavy goods vehicles’ access to city centres may at first glance appear attractive but how effective are such controls? Jon Masters reviews emerging trends across Europe. Around 1,700 European cities have implemented low emission zones (LEZs) and in addition some have restricted city centre access for heavy goods vehicles (HGVs). Even those that restrict HGV access, such as Paris and Rome, allow exemptions at certain times and for particular classes of vehicle. But with what effect?
  • Voting for change - the democratisation of transportation
    December 8, 2014
    Contra Costa is using an innovative planning method to gather suggestions and craft future transportation spending plans. Public opinion in matters relating to transport rarely exceeds complaints about congestion on the roads, crowded metros, slow buses with ‘exorbitant’ fares or perhaps enforcement cameras.
  • ITS benefits escape public
    June 8, 2015
    John Kendall considers the public’s awareness of the benefits of ITS. While the results of developing ITS technology may be clear to readers of ITS International, there is far less evidence that drivers have any appreciation of what the technology is doing for them. So how aware are drivers of the developments that are designed to make their journeys less congested and safer?