Skip to main content

US drivers receptive to usage-based auto insurance

US drivers are predominantly open-minded to purchasing usage-based auto insurance (UBI) policies, or pay as you drive insurance, according to a new survey by professional services company Towers Watson. The survey results are a clear indication that UBI is gaining momentum in the marketplace, with more consumers willing to let insurers monitor their driving habits with a telematics device in exchange for potential savings on their car insurance. Most (79 per cent) respondents to the UBI Consumer Survey
September 5, 2013 Read time: 2 mins
US drivers are predominantly open-minded to purchasing usage-based auto insurance (UBI) policies, or pay as you drive insurance, according to a new survey by professional services company Towers Watson. The survey results are a clear indication that UBI is gaining momentum in the marketplace, with more consumers willing to let insurers monitor their driving habits with a telematics device in exchange for potential savings on their car insurance.

Most (79 per cent) respondents to the UBI Consumer Survey indicated they either would buy a UBI policy or are willing to consider the concept, and if insurers would guarantee drivers’ premiums would not rise, that percentage increased to 89 per cent. Interest in UBI programs was highest among younger drivers (18- to 34-year-olds) with approximately two-thirds (66 per cent) saying they would definitely or probably purchase a UBI policy. Roughly half (54 per cent) of the participants who drive every day showed a strong interest in UBI.

The survey looked beyond pricing benefits associated with UBI products to gauge consumers’ interest in various value-added services that can be enabled by the technology underlying UBI devices. Drivers indicated a telling interest in a number of these services, and 72 per cent of those interested in UBI said they would be willing to pay for them. Drivers showed most interest in vehicle theft tracking, automated emergency response, and vehicle wellness reports.

Notably, 60 per cent of those interested in UBI programs said they would be willing to change their driving behaviour. This was highest among younger drivers, who represent the largest risk segment. When asked how they might change their driving behaviour if a UBI device were to be installed in their car, respondents listed sticking to the speed limit, keeping a safer distance from other vehicles and driving more considerately as the leading adjustments.

Related Content

  • August 29, 2014
    Smart cars, smart roads seen as boosting safety
    A new America THINKS survey from national infrastructure solutions firm HNTB Corporation, finds Americans craving more technology to keep them safe and informed when they hit the road. And many Americans would be willing to part with more cash to implement a connected vehicle system, which would allow drivers to be notified about road conditions and potential dangers electronically in real-time. In fact, nearly two-thirds of Americans think using transportation technology that keeps drivers informed is m
  • March 6, 2023
    Sampo Hietanen on MaaS: “We needed better dreams”
    Sampo Hietanen, founder of MaaS Global, is one of the authors of the Mobility as a Service concept: the dream is still real, but MaaS needs to evolve, he insists
  • August 7, 2019
    Hawaii backs road user charging to replace fuel tax
    Fuel tax revenue in Hawaii is falling - and even in paradise, someone has to pay. Adam Hill talks to Hawaii DoT’s Scot Uruda about a major change in the way the state funds road improvements All over the world, governments, transportation agencies and local authorities are casting around for new forms of revenue as the money from taxes imposed on fuel begins to trickle away. Spending is outstripping tax take as a combination of more efficient internal combustion engines and the increasing take-up of cars
  • February 2, 2012
    Road user charging – change the name to change public perceptions
    Jack Opiola explores the oft-underestimated effect that a charging scheme's name can have on public acceptability and ultimate success. The Bard of Avon wrote: "What's in a name?" For transport, especially Road User Charging, that is an especially relevant question.