Skip to main content

Uber ordered to shut Brussels service

A Belgian court has confirmed a ban on controversial ride-sharing app UberPOP, giving it 21 days to close operations in Brussels or risk massive penalties. UberPOP is the cheaper and less regulated service from Uber, the Silicon Valley start-up with a valuation of some US$50 billion that launched in capitals across Europe, often in open violation of local taxi laws. A spokesman for Uber confirmed the decision from the Brussels court, which followed a ban decided in April 2014 that the company ignored.
September 28, 2015 Read time: 2 mins
A Belgian court has confirmed a ban on controversial ride-sharing app UberPOP, giving it 21 days to close operations in Brussels or risk massive penalties.

UberPOP is the cheaper and less regulated service from Uber, the Silicon Valley start-up with a valuation of some US$50 billion that launched in capitals across Europe, often in open violation of local taxi laws.

A spokesman for Uber confirmed the decision from the Brussels court, which followed a ban decided in April 2014 that the company ignored.

Uber executive Filip Nuytemans said the company was looking at the implications of this ruling which it claims hurts hundreds of its driver-partners and tens of thousands of people who have come to rely on UberPOP to get around Brussels safely and affordably.

Another Uber executive said the company had 21 days to fall in line with the ban or face penalties. Nuytemans said Uber's more expensive service UberX, which requires drivers to be professionally licensed, was not affected by the ban.

Anticipating the court decisions, premium service UberX launched earlier this month, following a similar strategy in Paris, where UberPOP is also banned. France's highest court on Tuesday confirmed the ban in a huge setback for the company that sees the country as a strategic market.

Related Content

  • March 6, 2017
    Uber loses London court battle
    Taxi app Uber has lost a court battle to stop Transport for London (TfL) from imposing strict new English reading and writing standards on private hire drivers, according to Reuters. The company took legal action in August after TfL said that drivers should have to prove their ability to communicate in English, including to a standard of reading and writing which Uber said was too high. On Friday, a High Court judge rejected Uber's claim. "TfL are entitled to require private hire drivers to demonstra
  • June 26, 2020
    Masks and AI: the new mobility reality
    French authorities are using artificial intelligence to track face covering compliance
  • May 1, 2024
    The path to safer roads: America can learn from Europe’s example, says Verra Mobility
    Many US states are establishing road safety programmes that will inspire others. TJ Tiedje, vice president commercial at Verra Mobility, explains why this is important
  • September 11, 2015
    Court rules former Uber driver was an employee
    Ride-hailing company Uber has lost another legal round in the dispute over whether its drivers are independent contractors or employees, an issue that threatens the core of the ride-hailing company's business model, says Reuters. The California Employment Development Department (EDD) recently determined that a former Uber driver in Southern California was an employee, not an independent contractor as the company has claimed and as such was entitled to employee benefits. The decision was upheld twice on a