Skip to main content

Tiredness as dangerous as severe alcohol-impaired driving

According to research produced by Utrecht University in the Netherlands and published in the Journal of Sleep Research, just two hours of continuous nocturnal driving is sufficient to produce driving impairment comparable to a blood alcohol concentration (BAC) of 0.05%. After four hours, driving impairment corresponded to a BAC of 0.10% - well over the drink drive limit for most countries.
May 17, 2012 Read time: 2 mins
According to research produced by 5584 Utrecht University in the Netherlands and published in the Journal of Sleep Research, just two hours of continuous nocturnal driving is sufficient to produce driving impairment comparable to a blood alcohol concentration (BAC) of 0.05%. After four hours, driving impairment corresponded to a BAC of 0.10% - well over the drink drive limit for most countries.

To arrive at these conclusions, researchers at Utrecht tested 14 healthy young men who drove three sessions during night-time on the open road. The driving sessions were of two, four, and eight hours (03:00–05:00, 01:00–05:00 and 21:00–05:00 hours) duration. They had to drive at a constant speed (130 km/h; 80 mph) and maintain a steady position in the middle of the traffic lane.

Standard deviation of lateral position (SDLP, cm) - measuring the weaving of the car in the last driving hour of each session - was the primary parameter which enabled the researchers to compare the effects of prolonged nocturnal highway driving with driving impairment (SDLP increment) observed at different BACs.

As the research points out, in industrialised countries, one-fifth of all traffic accidents can be ascribed to sleepiness behind the wheel. Indeed, the number of reported sleep-related accidents is probably an underestimation since it is difficult to assess driver sleepiness objectively. In quantifying the major impact of duration of nocturnal driving, the researchers believe that the comparison with BAC levels provides policy makers with evidence-based driving duration limits and makes the impact of prolonged nocturnal driving readily understandable to drivers.

Related Content

  • Costing transit is complicated case
    August 19, 2015
    David Crawford welcomes fresh thinking from Canada. Public transit improvements can bring society “significantly more value” than conventional transport models normally indicate, argues Canadian researcher Todd Litman. “Traditional evaluation practices originally developed to assess roadway improvements, and focus primarily on vehicle travel speeds and operating costs. “They do not generally quantify or monetise basic mobility benefits, vehicle ownership and parking cost savings, or efficient land developme
  • IAM calls for greater focus on intelligence led drink drive enforcement
    August 8, 2014
    There should be greater use of intelligence-led policing to catch drink drivers who repeatedly and excessively flout the law, according to road safety charity Institute of Advanced Motorists (IAM). The call from the IAM comes as new figures published by the Department for Transport show the number of fatal accidents involving drink drivers last year falling by five per cent, from 220 in 2011 to 210 in 2012. In the same period, the number of people killed in drink drive accidents decreased by four per cent,
  • Call for targeted safety measures to prevent road deaths among young drivers
    January 26, 2017
    Zero tolerance on drink driving, additional hazard perception training and graduated forms of licensing should become the norm to help tackle the risks faced by young drivers and motorcycle riders in Europe, according to the YEARS report (Young Europeans Acting for Road Safety. More than 3,800 young people (aged 18-24) are killed each year on EU roads – the biggest single cause of death for this age group. A report by the European Transport Safety Council (ETSC) and the UK Parliamentary Advisory Council
  • Mounting benefits of dynamic tolling project
    January 30, 2012
    Wisconsin's four-year HOT lanes pilot project, launched in May 2008, cost US$18.8 million to construct. Halfway into the project, which uses variably priced, or dynamic, tolling to improve highway efficiency, the benefits are mounting. The problem was obvious, and frustrating, to anyone who ever sat in bumper-to-bumper traffic on State Route 167 and watched a lone car whiz by every 20 seconds or so in the carpool lane. But for planners at the Washington State Department of Transportation, the conundrum was