Skip to main content

Tiredness as dangerous as severe alcohol-impaired driving

According to research produced by Utrecht University in the Netherlands and published in the Journal of Sleep Research, just two hours of continuous nocturnal driving is sufficient to produce driving impairment comparable to a blood alcohol concentration (BAC) of 0.05%. After four hours, driving impairment corresponded to a BAC of 0.10% - well over the drink drive limit for most countries.
May 17, 2012 Read time: 2 mins
According to research produced by 5584 Utrecht University in the Netherlands and published in the Journal of Sleep Research, just two hours of continuous nocturnal driving is sufficient to produce driving impairment comparable to a blood alcohol concentration (BAC) of 0.05%. After four hours, driving impairment corresponded to a BAC of 0.10% - well over the drink drive limit for most countries.

To arrive at these conclusions, researchers at Utrecht tested 14 healthy young men who drove three sessions during night-time on the open road. The driving sessions were of two, four, and eight hours (03:00–05:00, 01:00–05:00 and 21:00–05:00 hours) duration. They had to drive at a constant speed (130 km/h; 80 mph) and maintain a steady position in the middle of the traffic lane.

Standard deviation of lateral position (SDLP, cm) - measuring the weaving of the car in the last driving hour of each session - was the primary parameter which enabled the researchers to compare the effects of prolonged nocturnal highway driving with driving impairment (SDLP increment) observed at different BACs.

As the research points out, in industrialised countries, one-fifth of all traffic accidents can be ascribed to sleepiness behind the wheel. Indeed, the number of reported sleep-related accidents is probably an underestimation since it is difficult to assess driver sleepiness objectively. In quantifying the major impact of duration of nocturnal driving, the researchers believe that the comparison with BAC levels provides policy makers with evidence-based driving duration limits and makes the impact of prolonged nocturnal driving readily understandable to drivers.

Related Content

  • IAM calls on government to increase targeted enforcement
    June 4, 2015
    The Institute of Advanced Motorists (IAM) is urging the new government to increase its efforts in promoting road safety by giving targeted enforcement a higher priority. With the yet-to-be-revealed figures for 2014 shaping up to show an increase in deaths and injuries on UK roads, the IAM believes the new government must make road traffic policing a core priority function for police forces and commissioners in England and Wales. The call comes following a survey conducted by the IAM throughout April 2
  • New Zealand seeks comprehensive CBA framework
    October 5, 2016
    New report highlights how assessing the financial benefit of deploying ITS is an involved and evolving calculation Following a global search, five key action areas have emerged from the New Zealand Transport Agency’s recent scoping of a more comprehensive cost–benefit analysis framework for evaluating planned ITS deployments. A report commissioned from engineering consultancy Aecom New Zealand sets out the groundwork for more closely-defined assessments that will convincingly support public-sector policy ma
  • Too safe for safety’s sake
    October 22, 2013
    In-vehicle systems are making huge advances in vehicle safety with the introduction of ABS, collision avoidance, adaptive cruise control, lane departure alert and blind spot warning… the list goes on. But at the same time accidents are still happening and arguably getting bigger. A look at a list of multi-vehicle (30 - 300) accidents across Europe, North and South America and parts of the Middle East shows that the trend is increasing with 2013 already having witnessed seven such incidents – three of which
  • Need for balance on UK speed enforcement funding cuts
    February 2, 2012
    Trevor Ellis, Chairman of the ITS UK Enforcement Interest Group, considers the implications of the UK Government's decision to withdraw funding for road safety camera partnerships