Skip to main content

Parking expert: end Monopoly's Free Parking!

Players should pay if they land on board game square, says Professor Donald Shoup
By Adam Hill November 25, 2020 Read time: 2 mins
Should this be Paid Parking? (© ITS International)

The author of an influential work on the economics of parking has suggested that world-famous board game Monopoly should do away with its 'Free Parking' square.

Donald Shoup, professor of urban planning at University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA), says the square risks reinforcing misconceptions in players from an early age about the true cost of parking.

He wrote seminal book The High Cost of Free Parking and argues that on-street parking in effect gives away for free some of the most valuable land in a city.

He suggests that Monopoly's Free Parking space should be named Paid Parking to encourage a more realistic attitude towards something that's often taken for granted.

In an interview with ITS International he explained: "Children first learn about free parking, cities and the economy when they play Monopoly."

"When they land on another player’s property, they learn about being tenants. When they land on a property they have bought, they learn about being owner-occupiers. When another player lands on their property, they learn about being landlords."

"When they take out mortgages to build houses, they learn about investing.  When they remove houses to build hotels, they learn about urban renewal.  Finally, they learn about bankruptcy because the game ends when every player but one is bankrupt."

However, he says, one thing in the game does not add up: the probability of landing on Free Parking is the same as landing on Go To Jail.

"Most children don’t go to jail when they grow up, but almost all of them will park free when they get real cars because parking is free to the driver for 99% of all automobile trips in the US," he adds.

Shoup accepts that no-one wants to pay for parking - including him - but insists that cities should not be planned around free parking.

"Almost all parking is free to the drivers, but the cost doesn’t go away just because the driver doesn’t pay for it," he points out.

"The cost is shifted into higher prices for everything else, and even people who cannot afford a car pay indirectly for the free parking."

He says the US now has more parking space per car (at least 900 square feet) than housing space per person (about 800 square feet). 

"And all the free parking greatly increases the amount of driving, which congests traffic, pollutes the air and contributes to global warming," he concludes.

The full interview will be in the November-December edition of ITS International

Related Content

  • Cannabis and cars don’t mix
    October 28, 2022
    Increased – legal – cannabis use has created increased – illegal – use by drivers. Adam Hill looks at a new report which advises State Highway Safety Offices on tackling the issue
  • Smarter transport remains key to smart cities
    January 9, 2018
    Colin Sowman looks at some of the challenges and solutions that will provide enhanced transport efficiency in tomorrow’s smarter cities. However you define a ‘smart city’, one of the key ingredients will be an efficient transport system. As most governments and city authorities face financial constraints, incremental improvements in the existing systems is the most likely way forward. In London, new trains and signalling are improving the capacity of the Underground but that then reveals previously
  • VW scandal prompts emissions testing debate
    December 1, 2015
    In the wake of the VW scandal John Kendall looks at emissions testing on both sides of the Atlantic. Since the VW emissions story broke in September, emissions testing has come under greater scrutiny, and none more so than in Europe, where critics have long been highlighting the weaknesses of the testing system. Ironically, changes to the emissions testing process were already under review but the story has pushed it up the agenda.
  • A global standard for enforcement systems – is it necessary?
    May 30, 2013
    Jason Barnes speaks to leading figures from the automated enforcement sector about whether a truly international standard for automated enforcement systems is necessary or can ever be achieved. Recent reports of further press controversy in the US over automated enforcement (see ‘Focusing on accuracy?’, ITS International raise again the issue of standards and what constitutes ‘good enough’ in terms of system accuracy and overall solution effectiveness. Comparatively, automated enforcement has always expe