 
    Colin Sowman looks at some of the challenges and solutions that will provide enhanced transport efficiency in tomorrow’s smarter cities.       
     
However you define a ‘smart city’, one of the key ingredients will be an efficient transport system. As most governments and city authorities face financial constraints, incremental improvements in the existing systems is the most likely way forward. 
     
In London, new trains and signalling are improving the capacity of the Underground but that then reveals previously dormant bottlenecks in passenger tunnels and ticket halls, at the barriers and even when boarding and leaving the trains. 
     
At its London Innovation Centre, 
     
The system counts the size of the crowd using paired infra-red sensors with top-down location awareness to evaluate the balance between those entering and exiting a station and automatically reconfigures the gates to relieve any crowd build-up. 
     
Similar technology is being developed to evaluate the number of people boarding and alighting from underground trains to identify which carriages have more space for people to board. Sending that information ahead to the next station enables travellers on the platform to congregate in areas corresponding to the emptier carriages and to board faster.
 
The movement of people through common areas is a  major factor in transport hub efficiency. Factors such as people  stopping to read the destination boards or where flows of people needing  to cross each other’s paths can slow progress and cause queues. To  observe this in a live environment, Cubic is using facial recognition  and other technologies to track people through the monitored area. The  anonymised data is collected and aggregated to analyse the flow of  people and detect anything that inhibits that flow.
     
One  of the biggest obstructions is the need to present a ticket at a  barrier. To overcome this Cubic is developing a Bluetooth low-energy  (BLE) system to identify approaching travellers and grant entry with  minimal delay. A back-office system retrospectively calculates journey  fares for account-based billing. 
     
Currently  being piloted at one of the UK’s busiest rail stations, Paddington, not  only does this improve passenger throughput, it also expands data  aggregation and planning. 
     
Ultimately  the company believes physical gates will be largely eliminated which  will double passenger throughput from 25/min to 50/min per gate. Its  experimental FasTrak system uses a 3-D stereoscopic scanner for facial  recognition, Bluetooth and RFID wireless technologies for activation,  and a biometric database for high-speed dataset lookup.
     
Passage would only be denied entry if facial recognition determines that an individual has not registered for the service. 
     
The  system logs incidents where the face is purposely obstructed and not  recognisable to create an intelligent report that shows the days, times  and places of these occurrences. As the database grows, evaders’  routines can be mapped to allow transport operators to predictively  arrange enforcement and once the individual(s) are identified, penalties  or prosecution can be actioned to recoup losses.
 
    London  Underground, like other transport systems,  offers many options to get  from A to B and research reveals that  travellers will use them all –  even the slower and convoluted routes.  To help London’s travellers (even  regular users) find the fastest  route, Cubic is testing an interactive  underground map with a 65inch  touchscreen. Users select their  destination and the map provides  concise directions for the quickest  route and produces a QR code which  loads the directions onto the user’s  smart phone.
     
Buses  are  central to most cities’ public transport systems. However, most  are  diesel-powered which contribute to urban air quality problems and  this  is exacerbated by the stop-start nature of bus operations, and   congestion, which sees the exhaust emission control cool down resulting   in a drastic loss of efficiency. 
     
Electric   buses are a solution but their limited operating range has been   restrictive. To counter this 
     
As the   bus approaches the mast, a Wi-Fi connection confirms that it is safe for   the pantograph to descend and a smart controller automatically drops   the pantograph onto charging rails on the roof.
     
Transport   for Greater Manchester in the UK, is trialling an electric-powered   Volvo bus and an OppCharge on its circular Metroshuttle 2 route which is   around 11.5km long and takes about 45 minutes. The free-use service   runs 12 hours a day and uses a single OppCharge point while a similar   arrangement is being tried in Malmö, Sweden, on a 14.7km route.
     
Volvo calculates the socio-economic road noise cost of the electric bus is 90% lower than a diesel-powered counterpart.  
 
Lower   noise could be a significant benefit of 
     
If  a   smart city’s transport system is to succeed, it needs to be smart    24/7/365 - even when it is undergoing changes and redevelopment - and    Singapore’s bus system is a case in point. The country’s third largest    bus interchange, serving 400,000 passengers per day in the Woodlands    region, needs a major three-year rebuild so to maintain services during    the redevelopment, a temporary bus interchange has been introduced. 
     
While    a temporary interchange (with spaces for 51 articulated and 10 rigid    buses) will never be ideal, it still must be efficient. This includes a    need to minimise delays in finding a parking bay so the authority has    installed 
     
A    large electronic panel shows the number of available parking spaces  as   the buses enter the interchange which can save bus drivers up to  three   minutes in finding an empty bay. 
     
Other    features include cameras placed above queue berths to alert   interchange  operators to crowds, so they can adjust bus arrivals   accordingly.
     
Future  road   transport will use a multitude of fuels (diesel, petrol, hydrogen  fuel   cells, electricity, gas and possibly more) with urban transport    favouring the cleanest solutions while fossil fuel will retain a    stronger foothold in rural areas and on longer distances.
     
This    poses energy companies like Shell (which has some 43,000 fuel  stations   in 80 countries) with a conundrum - which fuel to provide in  which   location? Stuart Blyde, its lead for connected car and connected  stores   of tomorrow says, “this is an energy and a digital  transformation   combined.
     
“There  won’t be   one solution but a mix. We will keep close to the market and  the OEMs   and adapt our retail portfolio as necessary.” 
     
This    will probably require new forecourt layouts and places for people to    get a coffee while their electric vehicle is charging or even separate    stations dedicated to different fuels. His recipe is: “Try  everything,   some will fail, others will succeed but the ability to  ‘fail fast’ is   vital because if you keep on for too long and something  then fails, you   can be left miles away from your overall objective.”
     
Shell    is trying new services such as Tap-Up in the Netherlands where the    company sends out a truck to fuel up vehicles rather than the vehicles    coming to the station. “We will test it and if it works we will think    about scaling it up.” 
 
Electric    fast charging points are being  installed in many of the company’s    stations but local needs and  business models vary from place to place    and from country to country.  “We are willing to try out new energy    mixes. We have some emobility  in London and in Germany we are    collaborating with the government and  other companies to build a network    of 400 hydrogen refilling  stations. Half of the energy for those    stations must be from  renewable sources.”
     
Its     Fill up and Go connected car scheme aims to simplify refuelling by     geo-locating the vehicle, meaning the driver only needs to enter the     pump number and their pin code for their account to be automatically     debited. As well as being quicker, he says parents like the scheme as     they do not have to leave their children in the car while they visit  the    kiosk to pay. 
     
Looking     ahead to an era of shared mobility, he sees account flexibility as     particularly important because the driver may not own the vehicle or  be    an employee of the owner and may be unwilling or unable to pay for   fuel   or a recharge out of their own pocket. Already, a EuroShell  card  can  be  used to pay for other goods and services, including  tolls, and  this  will  be taken forward, and expanded into its digital  offerings.   Blyde  says:  “This is not just about deciding the products  we want to  sell but  the  platforms we want to use. Fleet owners want  everything  bundled  together  in one account so it is hassle free for  their drivers  - and  digital is  great for that.”
     
Inter-urban     travel will remain an important factor in future transport and    recently  the ‘Hyperloop’ concept, which uses magnetically elevating    trains  running through evacuated tubes, has gained significant    momentum. A  Canadian study of a high-speed link between Toronto and    Windsor  (opposite Detroit) using a local Hyperloop-style system called    TransPod,  provides an interesting insight. The trains comprise of a    number of 27  people/ 10 – 15tonne pods and are capable of speeds in    excess of  1,200km/h (745mph). This would make the 370km (230 mile) trip    from  Toronto to Windsor 45 minutes which TransPod director Thierry    Boitier  says will be “as quick as short-hop inter-city flights”. 
     
Such     high-speed trains work best on longer, inter-urban distances but the     idea is that they will run city centre to city centre and ‘points’  or    ‘junctions’ can be made for diverging and converging networks. The     trains can run at 80 second intervals, meaning the twin-tube system  can    transport up to 45 trains per hour in each direction – equating  to 14m    people per year.
     
A     government of Ontario study for the Toronto and Windsor project     estimated the cost for building a ‘traditional’ high speed rail line at     C$149m/km (US$117m/km) for 300km/h service or C$55m/km (US$43m/km)   with  a  250km/h system.
     
In   its   Order of Magnitude Analysis, TransPod identifies its preliminary    capital  costs as C$29m/km (US$23m/km) – including constructing a    service road.  As the 4m diameter steel tubes in which the trains run    sit on 5m high  pillars spaced 25m apart, the track can span many    obstructions without  additional infrastructure. 
     
Boitier     says a 14km radius is required to keep passengers “comfortable at   full   speed” with tighter curves negotiated at lower speed. The current    design  is limited to a gradient of 3.5% (not dissimilar to  high-speed   rail)  and the pillars can be varied in height to help  achieve this   while  minimising groundwork. 
     
Existing     roads can be utilised as the service road for construction and     maintenance purposes and the 1.5m (min) diameter pillars could even be     positioned between carriageways. Four emergency exits (two on each   side)   are required every 1.2km with an electricity substation every   5km.
     
TransPod   says the   system is carbon negative with the solar panels on top of the   tubes   feeding electricity into the utility supply and over a year they   would   generate as much, or more, electricity than the trains consume. 
    
 Wireless transmission        
         
Smart cities will increase  demand for communications - not only for transport and ITS sectors, but  increasingly for the Internet of Things (IoT) including smart meters,  healthcare monitoring, home security systems, remote lighting … the list  goes on. 
         
     However, every  additional device takes up some bandwidth and expanding a fibre optic  cable network is prohibitively expensive – especially because of the  distributive nature of systems like, for instance, parking sensors.  According to the International WiSun Alliance, the answer is a  combination of edge processing and distributed node wireless  communications. 
         
     The  Alliance promotes the adoption of open industry standards. Its chairman,  Phil Beecher, says that at around one megabit per second, distributed  node wireless mesh networks are much faster than the low power wide area  networks used for high latency applications such as monitoring  recycling bins. Distributed node wireless mesh networks are designed to  work with edge computing and to share that information locally, making  them applicable to the transport and ITS sector. 
         
     “A  distributed node network is not as fast as fibre but good enough for  passing large amounts of numerical data between nodes as peer-to-peer  communication, although not for streaming live video. So as long as you  have power you can use edge computing to analyse the information and  transmit only relevant data wirelessly without the need to trench.” 
         
     He  gives the example of remote activation of streetlights and says the  node attached to the light “can also be used as a relay for other  communication and an ingress point for parking sensors, pedestrian and  cycle detection, average speed, sequencing traffic lights or other  instrumentation.”
         
• Further guidance on selecting wireless networks is available on the %$Linker:  
 
 
     
         
         
        



