Majority of Brits do not think AVs will reduce accidents, says Axa

Three-quarters of UK residents do not believe driverless cars will improve road safety, even though 90% of accidents are caused by human error. In a survey of 2,000 respondents, insurance firm Axa says only a third of UK residents believe driverless cars would be better for the environment and only 25% think the technology will improve safety for pedestrians. Axa emphasises that motorists are confused by the definition of a driverless car as well as by what sort of autonomous technology is available in mo
December 3, 2018 Read time: 2 mins

Three-quarters of UK residents do not believe driverless cars will improve road safety, even though 90% of accidents are caused by human error.

In a survey of 2,000 respondents, insurance firm Axa says only a third of UK residents believe driverless cars would be better for the environment and only 25% think the technology will improve safety for pedestrians.

Axa emphasises that motorists are confused by the definition of a driverless car as well as by what sort of autonomous technology is available in modern vehicles.

This confusion remained after survey respondents were shown the SAE (Society of Automotive Engineers) levels – a set of standards designed to explain the requirements for increasing driver assistance and autonomy.

Only a third of respondents define a driverless car in accordance with SAE Level 5 - a vehicle which can make informed decisions and does not require a driver to take control in any situation.

One in 10 people think a fully-driverless car has one form of autonomous technology, such as steering, speed or braking control – but this is SAE Level 1.

A quarter of respondents are unaware of cruise control, while 75% of drivers do not believe they have ever used this form of technology.

Despite this, six out of 10 people think cruise control has already improved road safety, with respondents feeling the same way about lane assist (82%) and parking assist (71%). More than 80% of participants believe that autonomous emergency braking, a solution which the 1816 European Union is calling to be made standard in all new vehicles, will also improve road safety.

David Williams, Axa technical director, says he is not surprised by the confusion surrounding new technology: “What is clear is that we need to educate motorists on the benefits of autonomous vehicles (AVs) because consumer trust will be vital to their success.”

Last month, Thatcham Research and Euro NCAP, a European safety organisation, %$Linker: 2 External <?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-16"?><dictionary /> 0 0 0 link-external revealed false http://news.thatcham.org/pressreleases/autonomous-driving-hype-is-dangerously-confusing-drivers-study-reveals-2767283 false false%> that 71% of UK drivers believe AVs are already on the market – and that nearly 20% think that a car marketed as being capable of automatic steering, braking and acceleration allows them to relax and let the car do the driving.

Related Content

  • March 7, 2018
    Here Technologies: location data sharing needs fundamental rethink
    76% of 8,000 individuals surveyed across eight countries feel stressed or vulnerable about sharing their location data, according to a new study by Here Technologies (Here). The report highlighted concerns that companies are abusing public trust in how they gather and use location data, which it claims will mean a fundamental rethink is necessary to help consumers embrace new services such as autonomous cars. The respondents stated that insufficient controls for management of personal data along with
    Read More
  • October 25, 2017
    RAC Foundation: UK drivers receive 12 million penalties annually
    Up to 12 million driving license holders receive a penalty notice each year – the equivalent of one every 2.5 seconds; meaning as many as a third (30%) of Britain's 40 million drivers now receive a penalty notice annually. The findings come from the Automated Road Traffic Enforcement: Regulation, Governance and Use - for the RAC Foundation by Dr Adam Snow, a lecturer in criminology at Liverpool Hope University. The penalty notices include the Fixed Penalty Notice (a criminal penalty issued
    Read More
  • February 7, 2019
    No need for safety drivers in AVs, says UK government
    The UK government has signalled that it is ready to allow autonomous vehicles (AVs) with no driver to be tested on public roads. It is already committed to having fully self-driving vehicles on UK roads by 2021. At present, operators are legally required to test AVs only when “a driver is present, in or out of the vehicle, who is ready, able, and willing to resume control of the vehicle”. But the Department for Transport (DfT)’s updated code of practice on trialling AVs on public roads - as opposed t
    Read More
  • December 13, 2013
    Daimler’s double take sees machine vision move in-vehicle
    Jason Barnes looks at Daimler’s Intelligent Drive programme to consider how machine vision has advanced the state of the art of vision-based in-vehicle systems. Traditionally, radar was the in-vehicle Driver Assistance System (DAS) technology of choice, particularly for applications such as adaptive cruise control and pre-crash warning generation. Although vision-based technology has made greater inroads more recently, it is not a case of ‘one sensor wins’. Radar and vision are complementary and redundancy
    Read More

Highlighted Content