Skip to main content

Majority of Brits do not think AVs will reduce accidents, says Axa

Three-quarters of UK residents do not believe driverless cars will improve road safety, even though 90% of accidents are caused by human error. In a survey of 2,000 respondents, insurance firm Axa says only a third of UK residents believe driverless cars would be better for the environment and only 25% think the technology will improve safety for pedestrians. Axa emphasises that motorists are confused by the definition of a driverless car as well as by what sort of autonomous technology is available in mo
December 3, 2018 Read time: 2 mins

Three-quarters of UK residents do not believe driverless cars will improve road safety, even though 90% of accidents are caused by human error.

In a survey of 2,000 respondents, insurance firm Axa says only a third of UK residents believe driverless cars would be better for the environment and only 25% think the technology will improve safety for pedestrians.

Axa emphasises that motorists are confused by the definition of a driverless car as well as by what sort of autonomous technology is available in modern vehicles.

This confusion remained after survey respondents were shown the SAE (Society of Automotive Engineers) levels – a set of standards designed to explain the requirements for increasing driver assistance and autonomy.

Only a third of respondents define a driverless car in accordance with SAE Level 5 - a vehicle which can make informed decisions and does not require a driver to take control in any situation.

One in 10 people think a fully-driverless car has one form of autonomous technology, such as steering, speed or braking control – but this is SAE Level 1.

A quarter of respondents are unaware of cruise control, while 75% of drivers do not believe they have ever used this form of technology.

Despite this, six out of 10 people think cruise control has already improved road safety, with respondents feeling the same way about lane assist (82%) and parking assist (71%). More than 80% of participants believe that autonomous emergency braking, a solution which the 1816 European Union is calling to be made standard in all new vehicles, will also improve road safety.

David Williams, Axa technical director, says he is not surprised by the confusion surrounding new technology: “What is clear is that we need to educate motorists on the benefits of autonomous vehicles (AVs) because consumer trust will be vital to their success.”

Last month, Thatcham Research and Euro NCAP, a European safety organisation, %$Linker: 2 External <?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-16"?><dictionary /> 0 0 0 link-external revealed false http://news.thatcham.org/pressreleases/autonomous-driving-hype-is-dangerously-confusing-drivers-study-reveals-2767283 false false%> that 71% of UK drivers believe AVs are already on the market – and that nearly 20% think that a car marketed as being capable of automatic steering, braking and acceleration allows them to relax and let the car do the driving.

Related Content

  • May 23, 2018
    AVs could make driving ‘more dangerous’: report
    Automated vehicles (AVs) could make driving more dangerous – that is the stark suggestion from a new report by the International Transport Forum (ITF). The report - Safer Roads with Automated Vehicles? – casts doubt on claims that 90% of road deaths could be avoided because the introduction of AVs would eliminate human error. ITF says such claims are at best “untested”.
  • May 13, 2016
    Assocations news worldwide
    ITS America 2016 promises to be anything but ‘business-as-usual’ as its new president and CEO, Regina Hopper, aims to broaden the scope and discussions at the event, billed as “A New Show Representing This Transformative Moment in Intelligent Transportation.” Signifying the changes, this year’s event is in San Jose at the heart of Silicon Valley and has adopted the theme “Integrated Mobility. Transportation Redefined.”
  • October 14, 2019
    Most pedestrian detection systems ‘hit pedestrians at 30mph’
    In-car automatic emergency braking systems with pedestrian detection mostly fail to avoid hitting pedestrians - and are “completely ineffective at night”, according to new research. In shocking findings, the American Automobile Association (AAA) revealed that most systems hit a simulated pedestrian target at 30mph. A collision also occurred 89% of the time when a vehicle operating at 20mph encountered a child darting between two cars. In tests, all vehicles collided with an adult pedestrian immediately fo
  • November 5, 2018
    ST Engineering to develop ITS and AV technology in Israel
    Singapore technology company ST Engineering intends to develop ITS and autonomous vehicle (AV) capabilities in Israel following an agreement with the municipality of Ashdod. The scope of the agreement includes ITS for roads and a fleet management system for buses.