Skip to main content

Europe’s city drivers ‘spending up to US$27 an hour on owning a car’

Recent research carried out by Opinion Matters for Zipcar among 2,500 car owner/drivers in London, Barcelona, Paris and Madrid, who drive regularly within these cities indicates that drivers are spending up to US$27 an hour owning a car. The research, which was based specifically on city drivers that own a car worth up to US$21,000 at time of purchase tallied up typical car costs such as road tax, maintenance, insurance, petrol and parking, as well as taking into account depreciation over the year. It
January 20, 2016 Read time: 2 mins
Recent research carried out by Opinion Matters for 3874 Zipcar among 2,500 car owner/drivers in London, Barcelona, Paris and Madrid, who drive regularly within these cities indicates that drivers are spending up to US$27 an hour owning a car.

The research, which was based specifically on city drivers that own a car worth up to US$21,000 at time of purchase tallied up typical car costs such as road tax, maintenance, insurance, petrol and parking, as well as taking into account depreciation over the year.  It shows just how much city drivers are prepared to spend on their cars versus the relatively limited amount of time they spend driving them.  In total, the average Londoner spends just 182 hours in their car annually, at a cost of US$27 per hour. Drivers in Paris spend an average of 132.5 hours in their car each year, at a cost of US$26 per hour, while drivers in Barcelona use their car for 197.6 hours a year, at a cost of UAS$16 per hour.  In Madrid, drivers pay US$17 per hour for the 218.4 hours a year they spend driving.

Drivers gave convenience, flexibility and the cost of using public transport as the top reasons for using their car; bad weather and the reliability of public transport were also given as reasons for owning a car in a major city.

Mark Walker, general manager of car club Zipcar UK said: “For most Londoners, their daily routine transport needs are satisfied perfectly by public transport, cycling and walking.  Owning a car for the occasional genuine need to drive is a real luxury, due to the heavy fixed costs that hit you – even before you’ve travelled a single mile – like, depreciation, insurance, maintenance/MOT and parking permit.  London is blessed with an excellent transport network and, if more people were to do the sums for themselves and realise how much their car trips cost them on an actual usage by-the-hour basis, they would be shocked.”

Related Content

  • May 9, 2019
    Switching Atlanta onto MaaS
    It’s easy to talk about MaaS in the abstract – but MaaS isn’t going to work if it’s just a theory. Colin Sowman speaks to one woman about the practical benefits - and difficulties - of getting out of her car and switching to public transit in Atlanta, Georgia One of the first goals of Mobility as a Service (MaaS) inventor Sampo Hietanen is that MaaS should persuade households they don’t need a second car. This is starting to happen - even in the car-dominated US. Last year, authorities in the state of Ge
  • April 22, 2020
    Visa and the power of mass transit transactions
    Contactless payment is the hidden power behind efficient public transportation. Visa’s Ana Reiley tells Adam Hill why buying a latte should be a model for frictionless ticketing 
  • May 21, 2012
    Benefits of car share quantified
    San Francisco Bay Area had fewer greenhouse gas emissions and less congestion in 2010 due to City CarShare's (CCS) service. According to results third-party studies and 2010 CCS data, City CarShare members saved US$82 million (over the cost of car ownership) and contributed to a greener environment by reducing 60 million pounds of CO2 emissions last year. Additionally, City CarShare, a Bay Area nonprofit, stated it continued to achieve financial sustainability in 2010, ensuring the 10-year old organisation
  • March 29, 2017
    Why the US said ‘yes’ to public transportation on 8 November
    Historic funding boost reflects America’s awareness of transit’s contribution to economic growth and quality of life. Something unexpected happened on Election Day 2016, a result nobody expected; public transportation was a clear winner. There were 49 transit-related funding initiatives on ballots across the nation, of which about 70% were passed.