Skip to main content

$4 per gallon gas won’t alter driving behaviour, claims national study

As America braces for $4 average price for gasoline and the potential fallout from breaching this psychological barrier, a new study has just been released by the Mobility Collaborative that predicts $4 per gallon is not enough to significantly reduce the number of people choosing to drive alone as single occupant vehicle travellers (SOV).
May 15, 2012 Read time: 2 mins
RSSAs America braces for $4 average price for gasoline and the potential fallout from breaching this psychological barrier, a new study has just been released by the Mobility Collaborative that predicts $4 per gallon is not enough to significantly reduce the number of people choosing to drive alone as single occupant vehicle travellers (SOV).

A review of gas prices and their weekly climb suggest that in the next few weeks America will reach $4 per gallon average. While gas prices vary regionally, experts predict that they will average $4 per gallon or higher throughout the summer of 2012. Recent predictions from the 5541 US Energy Information Administration suggest prices will average just over $4 per gallon by May and stay there.

The prevailing thought among transit agencies and transportation planners is that the $4 mark represents a major psychological threshold. Once breached, commuters will shift en mass from SOV travel to more efficient and less costly rideshare and telework options.

The Mobility Collaborative study suggests a different reality. According to the research, conducted by 5540 BIGinsight, only 8.7 per cent of respondents reported they would increase carpooling and 6.6 per cent say they would take public transit more. Consumers do not always act the way they report, but as the authors point out, the $4 per gallon price point has been reached twice previously. Both times interest in commute alternatives increased, but few actually changed behaviour. A small portion of individuals, often those with lower incomes who couldn't afford the additional costs, changed their behaviour, but not the masses as previously predicted.

This ‘non-event’ means America will continue as an automobile-dependent society. The study suggests two reasons why: First, automobiles are getting better gas mileage, reducing pressure caused by rising gas prices. Second, gas prices rise relatively slowly over time, so people learn to adjust their budgets to absorb the additional cost. These factors undermine America's shift to a more sustainable transportation system, like those found in a few American urban environments such as Arlington County, Virginia.

John Martin, a member of the Collaborative said "bigger things need to change in order for people to change their behaviour: Governments, vehicle manufacturers, employers and others need to provide travel options so consumers can accomplish the tasks of daily life while driving fewer miles."

The Mobility Collaborative's study "Mr. Toad's Wild Ride and the Rising Price of Gas," is available at sirtransportation.com.

For more information on companies in this article

Related Content

  • Survey reveals most dangerous driver behaviour in construction zones
    April 26, 2012
    According to a 495 Express Lanes survey of law enforcement officers serving in Northern Virginia, texting while driving is the most dangerous behavior in construction zones, ahead of speeding, aggressive driving and not obeying changing traffic patterns. Yesterday, in conjunction with National Work Zone Awareness Week in the US, partners on one of the largest highway construction projects in the region released these findings in a new distracted driving report.
  • Mileage based charging offers secure future for funding
    August 10, 2016
    HNTB’s Matthew Click sets out why a move to mileage-based pricing is inevitable. Infrastructure is the most neglected yet the most critical engine of our society, and our continued indifference could lead to a dystopian future. Our roads, bridges and highways have been largely passed by in the digital age—marginalised in an era when funding is limited and stewardship of physical assets has given way to our preoccupation with technological innovation and data—the stuff of the virtual realm.
  • Why the US said ‘yes’ to public transportation on 8 November
    March 29, 2017
    Historic funding boost reflects America’s awareness of transit’s contribution to economic growth and quality of life. Something unexpected happened on Election Day 2016, a result nobody expected; public transportation was a clear winner. There were 49 transit-related funding initiatives on ballots across the nation, of which about 70% were passed.
  • Report highlights community impact of new mobility options
    March 29, 2018
    Local authorities and communities must understand the impacts of the new mobility options and regulate to get the transport systems they want, according to a new report. Colin Sowman takes a look. Outside of the big cities plagued with congestion, the existing transportation system(s) often cope adequately, and the ongoing workload (maintenance, safety…) is more than enough to keep local transport authorities busy. Is it, therefore, a good use of public service employees’ time to keep abreast of the raft