Skip to main content

$4 per gallon gas won’t alter driving behaviour, claims national study

As America braces for $4 average price for gasoline and the potential fallout from breaching this psychological barrier, a new study has just been released by the Mobility Collaborative that predicts $4 per gallon is not enough to significantly reduce the number of people choosing to drive alone as single occupant vehicle travellers (SOV).
May 15, 2012 Read time: 2 mins
RSSAs America braces for $4 average price for gasoline and the potential fallout from breaching this psychological barrier, a new study has just been released by the Mobility Collaborative that predicts $4 per gallon is not enough to significantly reduce the number of people choosing to drive alone as single occupant vehicle travellers (SOV).

A review of gas prices and their weekly climb suggest that in the next few weeks America will reach $4 per gallon average. While gas prices vary regionally, experts predict that they will average $4 per gallon or higher throughout the summer of 2012. Recent predictions from the 5541 US Energy Information Administration suggest prices will average just over $4 per gallon by May and stay there.

The prevailing thought among transit agencies and transportation planners is that the $4 mark represents a major psychological threshold. Once breached, commuters will shift en mass from SOV travel to more efficient and less costly rideshare and telework options.

The Mobility Collaborative study suggests a different reality. According to the research, conducted by 5540 BIGinsight, only 8.7 per cent of respondents reported they would increase carpooling and 6.6 per cent say they would take public transit more. Consumers do not always act the way they report, but as the authors point out, the $4 per gallon price point has been reached twice previously. Both times interest in commute alternatives increased, but few actually changed behaviour. A small portion of individuals, often those with lower incomes who couldn't afford the additional costs, changed their behaviour, but not the masses as previously predicted.

This ‘non-event’ means America will continue as an automobile-dependent society. The study suggests two reasons why: First, automobiles are getting better gas mileage, reducing pressure caused by rising gas prices. Second, gas prices rise relatively slowly over time, so people learn to adjust their budgets to absorb the additional cost. These factors undermine America's shift to a more sustainable transportation system, like those found in a few American urban environments such as Arlington County, Virginia.

John Martin, a member of the Collaborative said "bigger things need to change in order for people to change their behaviour: Governments, vehicle manufacturers, employers and others need to provide travel options so consumers can accomplish the tasks of daily life while driving fewer miles."

The Mobility Collaborative's study "Mr. Toad's Wild Ride and the Rising Price of Gas," is available at sirtransportation.com.

For more information on companies in this article

Related Content

  • Overcoming the toll fatigue paradox
    July 17, 2025
    Why does the most transparent funding mechanism – the simplest, clearest and most intuitively logical – face the strongest public resistance? Tim McGuckin ponders the reasons…
  • Report highlights community impact of new mobility options
    March 29, 2018
    Local authorities and communities must understand the impacts of the new mobility options and regulate to get the transport systems they want, according to a new report. Colin Sowman takes a look. Outside of the big cities plagued with congestion, the existing transportation system(s) often cope adequately, and the ongoing workload (maintenance, safety…) is more than enough to keep local transport authorities busy. Is it, therefore, a good use of public service employees’ time to keep abreast of the raft
  • Study reveals benefits of electric Beijing taxi fleet
    August 6, 2013
    The impact of introducing plug-in electric vehicles to the streets of Beijing, one of the world’s most polluted cities, has been examined by researchers from the University of Michigan in the ACS journal Environmental Science and Technology. They use big data mining techniques to understand the impact of fleet electrification. As part of the study, the researchers highlight that while plug-in electric vehicles have developed rapidly in recent years there are still uncertainties with regard to market accepta
  • Sprawl spreads the costs and confines the benefits
    June 8, 2015
    A new report says car-centric planning leads to inefficient cities and divided communities as lead author Todd Litman explains. Between 1950 and 2050 the human population will have approximately quadrupled and shifted from 80% rural to nearly 80% urban; by the middle of this century the United Nations predicts an additional 2.2 billion urban residents in developing countries than there are today. How these cities grow has huge economic, social and environmental impacts and implementing proper policies can c