Skip to main content

Nothing smart about ‘deadly’ lay-bys on all-lane running motorways, says AA

Eight out of 10 UK drivers think that removal of hard-shoulders on smart motorways has made motorways more dangerous than four years ago, according to an AA-Populus poll of 20,845 drivers. Some drivers even refer to the lay-bys on these motorways as ‘death zones’.
September 27, 2016 Read time: 3 mins

Eight out of 10 UK drivers think that removal of hard-shoulders on smart motorways has made motorways more dangerous than four years ago, according to an AA-Populus poll of 20,845 drivers.

Some drivers even refer to the lay-bys on these motorways as ‘death zones’.

The main concern is the lack of lay-bys when the hard-shoulder is used as a running lane for the 130,000 AA members (and thousands of others) who break down on motorways each year. The 8101 Highways England guidance is for the Emergency Refuge Areas (ERA) to be no more than 2.6km apart (approx. 1.5 miles) whereas the AA would like to see at least twice as many lay-bys and they should be twice the length.

The AA says that if a car breaks down without sight of a lay-by it is likely to stop in a live running lane where it will be at increased risk of being hit from behind. If an HGV is parked in the lay-by it makes it almost impossible for a car to safely enter the lay-by.

Highways England has also reported a problem of drivers (in particular foreign trucks) parking in the ERAs when it is not an emergency.

Commenting, Edmund King OBE, AA president, said: “Four fifths of our members think that motorways without hard shoulders are more dangerous.

“Whilst we support measures to improve motorway capacity, we do not think that safety should be compromised. We do not accept that the current criteria of an Emergency Refuge Area or exit at least every 2.6km is safe.

“If drivers can see the next lay-by, they are much more likely to make it to the relative safety of that area even if their car has a puncture or is overheating. If they can’t see the lay-by, they often panic and stop in a live running lane. If more lay-bys are designed at the planning stage it will be less expensive and safer.

“It is time for the Government to go back to the drawing board and design a scheme acceptable to drivers.”

Amanda Stretton, motoring editor at Confused.com, comments, “There is a real need for British motorway systems to be improve, with new research predicting an increase of 60 per cent in motorway traffic by 2040. However the Government’s intention of turning hundreds of miles of hard shoulder into permanent lanes to expand capacity and tackle congestion issues has understandably split opinion.

"With speculation as to how safe these ‘all running lanes’ really are, there is concern from transport officials and MPs across the UK. In particular, in instances of emergency, run-off areas will be considerably smaller with far fewer emergency refuges.”

For more information on companies in this article

Related Content

  • Canada looks to HOT lanes to tackle congestion
    March 16, 2017
    David Crawford sees an evidence-based approach to HOT lane conversions. Canada’s first high occupancy toll (HOT) lanes opened on 16 September 2016 as a pilot on a 16.5km section of existing high occupancy vehicle (HOV) lanes running in both directions along Toronto’s Queen Elizabeth Way. Promised in two recent budgets
  • RAC survey shows big safety gains with average speed enforcement
    January 11, 2017
    Cheaper and easier communications are providing authorities with new options for influencing driver behaviour. Colin Sowman reports. It’s official; Average speed cameras (ASCs) cut the number of fatal or serious injury crashes by more than a third.
  • Mouchel appointed on Highways England smart motorways programme
    February 13, 2017
    Smart motorways expert Mouchel has been appointed by AECOM to jointly deliver two of the latest schemes awarded by Highways England on their smart motorway programme, which includes the M62 Junction 10 to 12 and the M6 Junction 21a to 26, in a contract worth around US$3.5 million (£2.8 million). Both schemes are intended congestion by improving transport links between Warrington and Wigan for the M6 and between Liverpool and Warrington New Town, and Manchester for the M62, while supporting economic growt
  • Theoretical limits
    February 27, 2012
    I'll take a punt that a few months ago not many outside those with some form of business or economics qualification had even heard of John Maynard Keynes and his ideas on governments' interventionist role in stimulating growth and stability.