Skip to main content

Gig economy drivers and riders at increased risk of collisions, warns UCL

Self-employed courier or taxi drivers who get their work through apps could be more likely to be involved in a collision, says a new study. The University College London (UCL) research found 63% of ‘gig’ economy respondents – who are not paid a salary - are not provided with safety training about managing risks on the road. The emerging issues for management of occupational road risk in a changing economy: A survey of gig economy drivers, riders and their managers also revealed 65% of drivers did not
September 3, 2018 Read time: 3 mins
Self-employed courier or taxi drivers who get their work through apps could be more likely to be involved in a collision, says a new study.


The University College London (UCL) research found 63% of ‘gig’ economy respondents – who are not paid a salary - are not provided with safety training about managing risks on the road.

The emerging issues for management of occupational road risk in a changing economy: A survey of gig economy drivers, riders and their managers also revealed 65% of drivers did not receive safety equipment such as a high visibility vests.

More than two in five drivers and riders report their vehicle had been damaged in a collision while working – and 8% of respondents said they were also injured.

For the study, Dr Nicola Christie and Heather Ward (UCL 8447 Centre for Transport Studies) carried out 48 qualitative, in-depth interviews with drivers, riders and their managers, and analysed 200 responses to an online survey taken by drivers and riders. The participants included couriers who deliver parcels and food and self-employed taxi drivers.

The document revealed 40% of those using an app found them to be a distraction while driving or riding.

According to UCL, most of the motorbike, moped and scooter courier participants report that the app they use is a distraction as it plays a noise to alert them to a job and provides them with a fixed window to accept it.

“Several participants alluded to personal and third-hand knowledge of security risks including being attacked, acid attacks and bike theft,” the report states.

UCL says other risks to gig economy drivers include tiredness – particularly among parcel couriers – from overwork as participants have admitted they are more likely to take risks such as speeding or jumping red lights to save time.

For the online survey, nearly half of respondents admitted to speeding, two-thirds parked illegally and a third had driven or ridden through a red light.

Ward says the number of hours these drivers need to work and the distances they must travel to earn a stable income increases as more workers enter the economy.

“We know this is an issue but don’t know exactly how far it extends, as not all companies need to report the number of self-employed couriers they use to the government.”

UCL recommends introducing time blocks for couriers to sign up and be paid for, rather than a drop rate. It adds that if drop rates are used they should consider the time taken to travel safely within the speed limit and to carry out tasks such as scanning parcels and obtaining signatures.

Additionally, the document stresses that mobile phones require handling to accept and reject jobs while driving and less distracting interfaces need to be developed by the industry.

Meanwhile, UCL suggests a person within a company should be responsible for managing safety of the people who provide an income for them.  

Christie says: “I hope to see the recommendations in this report taken on board by the 1837 Department for Transport and incorporated into health and safety regulations as the gig economy is set to continue to increase”.

A full copy of the report is available on the %$Linker: 2 External <?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-16"?><dictionary /> 0 0 0 link-external website false http://www.ucl.ac.uk/news/news-articles/0818/200818-gig-economy-drivers-traffic-collisions false false%>.

UTC

Related Content

  • July 23, 2019
    Lyft to offer AV service for blind riders
    Lyft has joined forces with Aptiv and the National Federation of the Blind (NFB) to bring self-driving technology to its blind and low-vision riders in Las Vegas. The deal extends an agreement last year, in which Aptiv launched 30 autonomous vehicles (AVs) to pick up riders using Lyft’s app. NFB president Mark Riccobono says: “This demonstration will allow future blind drivers to experience and begin providing feedback about this technology, paving the way for the development of a non-visual user in
  • October 25, 2017
    RAC Foundation: UK drivers receive 12 million penalties annually
    Up to 12 million driving license holders receive a penalty notice each year – the equivalent of one every 2.5 seconds; meaning as many as a third (30%) of Britain's 40 million drivers now receive a penalty notice annually. The findings come from the Automated Road Traffic Enforcement: Regulation, Governance and Use - for the RAC Foundation by Dr Adam Snow, a lecturer in criminology at Liverpool Hope University. The penalty notices include the Fixed Penalty Notice (a criminal penalty issued
  • March 11, 2019
    British Safety Council launches app for measuring air pollution in London
    The British Safety Council (BSC) and Kings College London have launched an app for outdoor workers to measure exposure to air pollution – an increasing preoccupation for the ITS industry. The Canairy app could help improve workzone safety by providing employees, and their bosses, with information to help them reduce exposure to air pollution. The app is being launched as part of the BSC’s ‘Time to Breathe’ campaign, which seeks to encourage companies, policymakers and regulators to take the risks of
  • September 18, 2019
    Uber: AB5 ‘does not automatically reclassify’ drivers
    Business life may be about to get trickier for transportation network companies following the passing of a new law in California which aims to give gig economy workers more rights. Assembly Bill 5 (AB5), which is due to come into effect in January next year, says that “a person providing labour or services for remuneration shall be considered an employee rather than an independent contractor” - unless three points are proved. One, that “the hiring entity demonstrates that the person is free from the con