Skip to main content

Gig economy drivers and riders at increased risk of collisions, warns UCL

Self-employed courier or taxi drivers who get their work through apps could be more likely to be involved in a collision, says a new study. The University College London (UCL) research found 63% of ‘gig’ economy respondents – who are not paid a salary - are not provided with safety training about managing risks on the road. The emerging issues for management of occupational road risk in a changing economy: A survey of gig economy drivers, riders and their managers also revealed 65% of drivers did not
September 3, 2018 Read time: 3 mins
Self-employed courier or taxi drivers who get their work through apps could be more likely to be involved in a collision, says a new study.


The University College London (UCL) research found 63% of ‘gig’ economy respondents – who are not paid a salary - are not provided with safety training about managing risks on the road.

The emerging issues for management of occupational road risk in a changing economy: A survey of gig economy drivers, riders and their managers also revealed 65% of drivers did not receive safety equipment such as a high visibility vests.

More than two in five drivers and riders report their vehicle had been damaged in a collision while working – and 8% of respondents said they were also injured.

For the study, Dr Nicola Christie and Heather Ward (UCL 8447 Centre for Transport Studies) carried out 48 qualitative, in-depth interviews with drivers, riders and their managers, and analysed 200 responses to an online survey taken by drivers and riders. The participants included couriers who deliver parcels and food and self-employed taxi drivers.

The document revealed 40% of those using an app found them to be a distraction while driving or riding.

According to UCL, most of the motorbike, moped and scooter courier participants report that the app they use is a distraction as it plays a noise to alert them to a job and provides them with a fixed window to accept it.

“Several participants alluded to personal and third-hand knowledge of security risks including being attacked, acid attacks and bike theft,” the report states.

UCL says other risks to gig economy drivers include tiredness – particularly among parcel couriers – from overwork as participants have admitted they are more likely to take risks such as speeding or jumping red lights to save time.

For the online survey, nearly half of respondents admitted to speeding, two-thirds parked illegally and a third had driven or ridden through a red light.

Ward says the number of hours these drivers need to work and the distances they must travel to earn a stable income increases as more workers enter the economy.

“We know this is an issue but don’t know exactly how far it extends, as not all companies need to report the number of self-employed couriers they use to the government.”

UCL recommends introducing time blocks for couriers to sign up and be paid for, rather than a drop rate. It adds that if drop rates are used they should consider the time taken to travel safely within the speed limit and to carry out tasks such as scanning parcels and obtaining signatures.

Additionally, the document stresses that mobile phones require handling to accept and reject jobs while driving and less distracting interfaces need to be developed by the industry.

Meanwhile, UCL suggests a person within a company should be responsible for managing safety of the people who provide an income for them.  

Christie says: “I hope to see the recommendations in this report taken on board by the 1837 Department for Transport and incorporated into health and safety regulations as the gig economy is set to continue to increase”.

A full copy of the report is available on the %$Linker: 2 External <?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-16"?><dictionary /> 0 0 0 link-external website false http://www.ucl.ac.uk/news/news-articles/0818/200818-gig-economy-drivers-traffic-collisions false false%>.

UTC

Related Content

  • November 6, 2019
    NTSB: Uber’s AV in fatal crash ‘had software issues’
    The US National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) has found that an Uber autonomous vehicle which killed Elaine Herzberg last year had software flaws. NTSB released a report which says the Volvo XC60’s autonomous system software classified the pedestrian as an unknown object and determined that an emergency braking manoeuvre was needed to mitigate the collision. Uber confirmed that emergency braking manoeuvres must be carried out manually and the system is not designed to alert the driver. Data
  • February 5, 2019
    Uber suspends Barcelona service after new regulations introduced
    Taxi-hailing giant Uber is suspending its service in the Spanish city of Barcelona. The move comes after new regulations were passed by local authorities, according to Reuters. The company started its UberX service in the city last year. But from now on, passengers using ride-hailing services will have to wait at least 15 minutes after booking a ride before they can be picked up – thus negating one of the key selling points of companies such as Uber. Speed and convenience – as well as cost – are w
  • April 18, 2018
    AV ride-sharing services must appeal to motivations and overcome barriers
    Autonomous vehicle (AV) ride-sharing services need to appeal to user motivations and overcome potential barriers or concerns, if they are to be successful, according to research conducted by Merge Greenwich. The study revealed that, on balance, ride-sharing presents a greater barrier-to-uptake than AV technology. 85% of respondents indicated a willingness to use an AV in the future, suggesting that the technology is the aspect of the service that excites them the most. 46% are willing to use a ride-shar
  • January 17, 2014
    New Riderscan survey on ITS and motorcycling safety
    The Riderscan project is launching its third and last survey targeting European motorcyclists. Focusing on new technologies and powered two wheelers (PTW), the survey will feed the Riderscan report on traffic management, providing a unique opportunity to European riders to express their views on coming intelligent transport technologies. Riderscan aims to bridge the gap between road safety authorities, researchers, and industry stakeholders by setting up a detailed survey over ITS systems in relation wit