Skip to main content

AVs could worsen air quality, says report

Canadian experts say need for data also threatens privacy and increases cybersecurity risk
By Ben Spencer March 15, 2021 Read time: 2 mins
CCA anticipates CASE vehicles will not be evenly distributed in Canada, at least at first (© Akarat Phasura | Dreamstime.com)

Connected, autonomous, shared and electric (CASE) vehicles have the potential to make transportation safer and more accessible - but there are downsides, says a new report

Without proactive urban management, they could also worsen air quality and traffic congestion and increase transportation inequities, warns the Council of Canadian Academies (CCA).

These vehicles will also collect and share “unprecedented amounts and types” of data, which threatens privacy, increases cybersecurity risks and creates regulatory challenges around cross-border privacy and data protection, CCA insists.

The organisation published the expert panel report - Choosing Canada's Automotive Future - to identify potential impacts for policy areas critical to connected and autonomous vehicle (C/AV) development and diffusion. 

The panel found the potential environmental and health benefits of CASE vehicles depend more on mobility behaviours than technological advances and anticipate these vehicles will not be evenly distributed across the country, at least initially.

On the data question, the primary threat to privacy is the steady accumulation of seemingly minor practices for information collection, the council adds. 

If managed appropriately however, the CCA points out this data could increase safety, efficiency, and accessibility for the public sector and private sector.

Jeannette Montufar, past board member of the Canadian Academy of Engineering and chair of the expert panel, says: “The long-term promise of Canada’s automotive future is on-demand, convenient, accessible, and affordable transportation across the country. Current planning and policy decisions related to public transit, ride-sharing, and active transportation will affect how, when, and where CASE vehicles are used in Canada in the next 10 to 30 years, and beyond.”

CCA CEO Eric M. Meslin says: “While the appearance of autonomous vehicles on public roads in Canada may seem inevitable, there’s still uncertainty about the timing of their arrival and their widespread adoption and acceptance. This report identifies potential impacts arising from the development and diffusion of CASE vehicles and offers evidence to help inform future policy decisions in Canada.”

The report was commissioned by Canada's former minister of innovation, science and economic development, Navdeep Bains, to better understand how decisions today will shape how C/AVs and shared mobility services will operate.

In January, Bains was replaced by Francois-Phillippe Champagne. 

A 12-member expert panel was assembled which included those with experience in environmental science, computer science along with automotive, information and communication technologies. 

Aside from Montufar, other panel members include Krzysztof Czarnecki (professor, electrical and computer engineering at the University of Waterloo), Ted Graham (head of open innovation at General Motors) and Sandra Phillips (founder of Movmi).
 

For more information on companies in this article

Related Content

  • Joined-up thinking for future ITS
    May 8, 2015
    David Crawford looks at a US model which, for modest federal funding, is producing substantive results. Outward and upward is the clear message emerging from the US$458,000, 2015 workplan of the US government’s ENTERPRISE (Evaluating New TEchnologies for Roads PRogram Initiatives in Safety and Efficiency) joint funding scheme for ITS research.
  • Israel aspires to ITS-led future
    May 29, 2013
    Shay Soffer, Chief Scientist with the Israel National Road Safety Authority, talks to Jason Barnes about his country’s current ITS outlook and how he sees this developing in the future. Israel ranks alongside countries such as the US and France in the road safety stakes, with an average 7.1 deaths per billion kilometres driven. But at that point the similarities end, as the country’s overriding issue is pedestrian safety. This is driven by several factors, including being a relatively small country where pe
  • Cooperative infrastructure systems waiting for the go ahead
    February 3, 2012
    Despite much research and technological promise, progress towards cooperative infrastructure system deployment is still slow. Here, Robert Cone and John Miles take a considered look at how and when it might come about. From a systems engineering viewpoint it looks logical and inevitable that vehicles should be communicating between themselves and with the road infrastructure. But seen from a business viewpoint the case is not proven.
  • The FIA’s formula for future mobility
    March 11, 2016
    The FIA’s Region I president Thierry Willemarck tells Colin Sowman about his organisation’s campaigning work for the rights of road users and mobility for all. The Fédération Internationale de l’Automobile may be best known as the FIA and the governing body for world motor sport - particularly Formula 1 - but its influence spreads far wider than the racetrack. The organisation was founded in 1904 with a remit to safeguard the rights and promote the interests of motorists and motor sport across the world. No