 
     David Crawford looks at a US model which, for modest federal funding, is producing substantive results.    
     
Outward and upward is the clear message emerging from the US$458,000, 2015 workplan of the US government’s ENTERPRISE (Evaluating New TEchnologies for Roads PRogram Initiatives in Safety and Efficiency) joint funding scheme for ITS research. 
     
ENTERPRISE is a transportation pooled fund (TPF) initiative set up by the US DOT’s Federal Highway Administration to coordinate and contribute to US state and local agency efforts. Its US$475,000 budget for 2015 comes from annual and project contributions by member agencies - 11 state DOTs and the Ministry of Transportation in Ontario, Canada (one of two non-US participants, the other being The Netherlands). These are the primary source of project proposals and voting for the ones they want to see carried out.
     
Criteria for acceptance of a TPF proposal is that the project tackles a new area of research or technological innovation; or to deliver fresh information or additional experience to fill gaps in, or further advance, previous work (see below). Partners must show that they consider issues important enough to pledge their own funds; and that there is substantial interest in producing a relevant solution. 
     
US state DOTs can make their own contributions using federally-derived state planning and research funds. These derive from a mandatory 2% of each state’s total apportionment of dollars under relevant programmes from the Highway Trust Fund, the US’ fuel tax-fed national resource for financing highway and other transportation funding. 
     
Of the 2% set aside, a minimum of 25% must be spent on state planning and research. State planning and research sources typically cover at least 20% of the funding required, while the federal contribution is limited to a maximum of 80%.
Member states have the option of bringing in commercial partners. In encouraging the creation of public-private partnerships, the scheme uses criteria originally developed to support Minnesota’s Guidestar programme.
Projects  now getting under way with state departments of  transportation,  supported by ENTERPRISE’s coordinating role and  financial contributions,  cover topical concerns including cross-border  ITS and drone deployment.  
     
The  ‘Use of unmanned  aerial vehicles for road incident reporting’  initiative aims to leverage  growing interest in drone technology for  incident detection, emergency  response coordination, road condition  reporting and remote highway  monitoring. It is being supported by an  ENTERPRISE contribution of  US$50,000.      
It will build  on a Michigan state DOT project that is already researching the  potential role of unmanned aerial vehicles for road and bridge  monitoring. In September 2014, the Michigan Tech Research Institute flew  drones for the benefit of delegates to the ITS World Congress in  Detroit. 
     
Meanwhile, the  Ministry of Transportation in Ontario, Canada is currently using drones  to film traffic accident sites for future analysis. 
     
The  ‘ITS at international borders’ project (ENTERPRISE funding US$80,000)  addresses the fact that six US member state agencies have highway  networks that connect with those in Canada or Mexico. The key need they  have identified is for timely and accurate information on border waiting  times and security alerts, as well as on construction works under way  on the other side of the border. 
     
     ENTERPRISE  approvingly cites member Washington  State DOT’s travel  information  website’s ‘Traffic at the Canadian  border’ page,  experience from which  will be shared at a dedicated  project workshop. 
     
Other    2015 projects will research best practice in truck rollover warning    systems, aided by a US$60,000 ENTERPRISE contribution, and the policy    and legal aspects of using and sharing fibre-optic infrastructures in    ITS deployment to which ENTERPRISE is contributing US$35,000. A further    two are focussing on the role of dynamic message signs (DMS) in   advanced  travel information systems. 
 
The   first of these is receiving an ENTERPRISE contribution of  US$80,000  for  exploring the integration of active highway work zone  notifications   displayed on portable DMS into the permanent DMS  network. It is  piloting  a method for in-field devices such as portable  DMS to transmit  their  locational and message displayed data to a  reporting centre  without the  need for manual intervention. ENTERPRISE  member agencies  will be closely  involved in developing the necessary  engineering  documentation. 
 
The second project is looking at using portable travel time displays to optimise the deployment of permanent DMS installations used for integrated corridor management. While state DOTs have found DMS are effective in alerting drivers to expected delays ahead, the siting of the signs has not always been adequately researched. Their usefulness can be heavily influenced by, for example, the availability of alternative routes and general traffic patterns. As the ENTERPRISE workplan points out: ‘DOTs could invest considerable funding at one location only to find that the impact on travel delays is not recognised.’
Therefore the project is investigating the development of portable kits that will enable DOTs to ‘test the market’ with possible DMS sites before committing themselves to investing in permanent installations. The kit, which the project intends to demonstrate in the field with up to three member DOTs, will consist of Bluetooth sensors, relocatable DMS, communications links and data processing capability – all owned by the DOTs or leased externally. The cost of the pre-deployment phase is US$50,000, contributed by ENTERPRISE.
 This   second initiative follows on from a project to measure the   effects of   DMS on driver behaviour. A survey of motorists in the US   states of   Minnesota and Washington, carried out by Oregon-based 
     
In     Minnesota, 42.2% had changed their travel plans on their most recent     trip following information shown on the DMS; while 18% kept to their     original route. The corresponding figures for Seattle were 22% and  20%.  
     
The   study also  found  wide variations in the length of the delay that   prompted  diversions.  Minnesotans indicated a range of between five and   ten  minutes extra  driving; for their counterparts in Seattle, it needed    to be between 15  and 20 minutes. 
 
Issues    such as these have prompted the current project. Athey Creek  president    Dean Deeter told ITS International: “Our findings gave a  first    indication of drivers’ reactions to travel information  messages. These    give traffic management centres opportunities to  predict route changes    when DMS are indicating longer than usual  journey times.
     
“Centre     controllers can then, for instance, alter signal timings on the     alternative route to accommodate the increased numbers of vehicles that     are leaving main highways and display additional ‘wayfinding’  messages    along the advised routes. Our research also offers a glimpse  of the    predictability and impacts of crossing travel time diversion  thresholds    in the era of connected vehicles and personalised  information   delivery.”
In  Washington   State, state ITS operations engineer Bill Legg - who also  chairs the   ENTERPRISE programme nationally - told ITS International:  “The study   gave important confirmation that providing travel times is  useful to   motorists and helps them make more informed decisions. We  continue to   deploy additional travel time DMS on key commuter routes as  part of a   larger congestion management effort.” 
     
Another    project, for Canada’s MTO, has looked at the role of video analytics   as  a tool for traffic operations centres in data collection. A further    study, with the states of Minnesota and Idaho as partici-pants and    California-based 
     
Cogenia    technical partner Scott Andrews told ITS International: “Our solution    depends on availability. We suggested an initial deployment with    smartphones, since those are widely in use and equipped to support    cellular and Wi-Fi communications.”
     
The    core idea is that, when the smartphone is within cellular   connectivity,  it will collect information about the road network ahead,   between its  current location and the known next connectivity region.   This data might  be weather- or road-related - some collected from   vehicles that have  recently passed through and cache it for sending to a   traffic management  centre once they re-enter connectivity. 
     
“We    have supplemented this cellular delivery with, initially, WiFi, and,   as  available, dedicated short-range communications, at points such as   rest  areas and intersections,” said Andrews. “We have now identified a   range  of potential applications that could be implemented using the   resulting  model, developed these into a system design and proposed a   deployment  strategy.”
 
     
         
         
         
        



