Skip to main content

Bedfordshire police speed camera proposals ‘unhelpful’

A UK enforcement expert and the Institute of Advanced Motorists (IAM) have branded as ‘unhelpful’ the proposal by Olly Martins, Police Commissioner for Bedfordshire to use money from speed camera fines to fill a shortfall in police funding. Martins told the Home Affairs Select Committee that the force was ‘stretched to the limit’ and said, "We’ve extensively lobbied the Home Office for fair funding but they haven’t listened and the Chancellor's spending review at the end of the month means we face more c
November 9, 2015 Read time: 3 mins
A UK enforcement expert and the 6187 Institute of Advanced Motorists (IAM) have branded as ‘unhelpful’ the proposal by Olly Martins, Police Commissioner for Bedfordshire to use money from speed camera fines to fill a shortfall in police funding.

Martins told the Home Affairs Select Committee that the force was ‘stretched to the limit’ and said, "We’ve extensively lobbied the Home Office for fair funding but they haven’t listened and the Chancellor's spending review at the end of the month means we face more cuts. Strict enforcement of the speed limit could raise £1m and to me that’s better than losing 25 more police officers.”

To help with funding, he proposes permanently switching on the speed cameras on one of the busiest stretches of the M1 between junction 10 and 13. The cameras are usually only in operation when speed restrictions are in place.

Geoff Collins, sales and marketing director of 604 Vysionics, said, “It is unhelpful to encourage the belief in a link between speed enforcement cameras and revenue generation.  Drivers’ compliance is earned through the appropriate use of camera technology, typically through casualty reduction and improving traffic flows, rather than raising money.”

Neil Greig, IAM director of policy and research, commented, “Comments like this don’t help the image of safety cameras because it reinforces the myth that they are just for raising money, not road safety.

It also highlights the inconsistencies between the different English police forces in the way they are using smart motorway enforcement technology which undermines  their  benefits and public confidence.”

Downing Street has warned that speed cameras should be about safety, not a revenue generator. Prime Minister David Cameron's official spokeswoman said: "We are very clear that speed cameras should be about safety, not about raising cash.

"The point we would make to those thinking about using them for other means is that it is important to note that revenue generated from speeding offences doesn't go to police forces, it goes to a central fund."

Money from speed camera fines goes to the consolidated fund - the Government's bank account at the Bank of England - for general expenditure. It can then be distributed by the 1837 Department for Transport through grants.

For more information on companies in this article

Related Content

  • RAC survey shows big safety gains with average speed enforcement
    January 11, 2017
    Cheaper and easier communications are providing authorities with new options for influencing driver behaviour. Colin Sowman reports. It’s official; Average speed cameras (ASCs) cut the number of fatal or serious injury crashes by more than a third.
  • Home Office approval for Redflex HADECS cameras
    April 14, 2014
    Redflex is proud to announce that its RedflexHadecs3 speed compliance camera system has received UK Home Office type approval (HOTA). RedflexHadecs3 is a gantry- or MS4 sign-mounted variant of Redflexspeed radar and is to be used by the UK Highways Agency for their Digital Enforcement Compliance System (HADECS 3) managed motorway project to support the implementation of mandatory and variable speed limits on selected motorways. Cameras mounted to the side of the motorway automatically adjust to the new e
  • Jenoptik Specs cameras for Manchester
    April 16, 2024
    Deal in the UK city comes after 90 Vector SR spot-speed systems supplied last year
  • Canadian authorities convinced of enforcement safety benefits
    November 28, 2012
    Cost-benefit analysis invariably finds highly in favour of speed and red light enforcement, particularly so in Edmonton in the Alberta province of Canada, where authorities need no convincing of the merits of road safety engineering. Justification of enforcement efforts on economic grounds has been reinforced this year, by a study of the costs and benefits of red light enforcement. New York-based economic research firm John Dunham & Associates carried out this latest analysis for American Traffic Solutions