Skip to main content

Speed camera law signed for six California cities

Enforcement pilots can start in LA, San Jose, Oakland, Glendale, Long Beach & San Francisco
By Adam Hill October 19, 2023 Read time: 2 mins
Oakland freeways (© Wirestock | Dreamstime.com)

Automated speed cameras can now be deployed in six Californian cities in a bid to curb dangerous driving.

State governor Gavin Newsom has signed into law a bill which means the cities of Los Angeles, San Jose, Oakland, Glendale and Long Beach, and the city and county of San Francisco, can now establish pilot speed enforcement programmes.

California's legislature acknowledged that speed "is a major factor in traffic collisions that result in fatalities or injuries" and that "traditional enforcement methods have had a well-documented disparate impact on communities of colour, and implicit or explicit racial bias in police traffic stops puts drivers of colour at risk".

Numerous speed safety system programmes in other states and cities "have proven successful in reducing speeding and addressing traffic safety concerns", it continues.

A 2017 National Transportation Safety Board study found these programmes "offered significant safety improvements in the forms of reduction in mean speeds, reduction in the likelihood of speeding more than 10 miles per hour over the posted speed limit, and reduction in the likelihood that a crash involved a severe injury or fatality". 

Such an approach "can advance equity by improving reliability and fairness in traffic enforcement while making speeding enforcement more predictable, effective, and broadly implemented, all of which helps change driver behaviour".

Warning notices - rather than fines - will be issued for the first 60 days of any programme in California and there are guidelines on the storage and use of data from the schemes.

Related Content

  • California's high-speed-rail project goes ahead
    October 20, 2014
    The California Supreme Court decided last week not to consider an appeal of a case brought by opponents of the state’s $68 billion bullet train project, paving the way for the project to go ahead. Opponents had questioned whether the California High-Speed Rail Authority was complying with the terms of the ballot measure that funded the project. The appellate court agreed there are legitimate legal concerns about whether the “high-speed rail project the California High-Speed Rail Authority seeks to bui
  • CRASH aids crash reduction
    August 6, 2014
    Announcing a decrease in traffic fatalities in Tennessee, US, earlier this year, the Tennessee Department of Safety and Homeland Security indicated preliminary figures of 988 traffic fatalities in 2013, a 2.7 per cent decrease compared to 2012, when there were 1,015 traffic fatalities. At the same time, Tennessee Highway Patrol (THP) Colonel Tracy Trott said: “In 2014, we will employ a predictive analytics model to look even more closely at where traffic crashes are most likely to occur and deploy our res
  • RAC survey shows big safety gains with average speed enforcement
    January 11, 2017
    Cheaper and easier communications are providing authorities with new options for influencing driver behaviour. Colin Sowman reports. It’s official; Average speed cameras (ASCs) cut the number of fatal or serious injury crashes by more than a third.
  • ITS World Congress debates perceptions of enforcement
    December 4, 2012
    The technical programme of this year’s ITS World Congress in Vienna includes a special session on the image of enforcement. ITS International examines the scale of the problem and what can be done about it. Debate on the merits and difficulties of enforcing speed limits appears centred on a conflict of principles. Put very simply, local communities, people living close to busy or hazardous roads, want to see traffic speeds calmed. Drivers on those roads, on the whole, want their principle of freedom to be m