Skip to main content

Toll roads important to Trump’s infrastructure plan

According to The Hill, US toll roads may surge under a US$1 trillion infrastructure proposal being floated by Donald Trump. The president elect’s idea for rebuilding the nation’s roads and bridges relies on private companies instead of the federal government to back transportation projects. Experts believe this means investors will be attracted to projects that can recoup their investment costs using some sort of revenue stream, such as through tolls or user fees. “If he moves forward with an infrastr
January 10, 2017 Read time: 3 mins
According to The Hill, US toll roads may surge under a US$1 trillion infrastructure proposal being floated by Donald Trump. The president elect’s idea for rebuilding the nation’s roads and bridges relies on private companies instead of the federal government to back transportation projects.

Experts believe this means investors will be attracted to projects that can recoup their investment costs using some sort of revenue stream, such as through tolls or user fees.

“If he moves forward with an infrastructure plan and there are tax incentives to investors that could bode well for more investments in new toll facilities,” said Patrick Jones, executive director and CEO of the 3804 International Bridge, Tunnel and Turnpike Association.

Cities and states have long struggled to raise revenue for transportation projects. The federal gasoline tax has remained static for over 20 years, while states are banned by the federal government from tolling existing lanes on interstate highways.

Outgoing Transportation Secretary Anthony Foxx said traditional approaches to funding and delivering federally-funded transportation programs... may no longer be capable of providing Americans with a state of the art transportation system.

Trump has floated a plan that would offer US$137 billion in federal tax credits to private investors who back transportation projects, which he says would unleash up to US$1 trillion worth of infrastructure investment over ten years. He argues that construction costs tend to be higher and take longer when the government builds projects instead of the private sector.

Historically, the country’s infrastructure is financed through state and local governments using a mix of their own revenues, federal highway aid and issued bonds.

Public-private partnerships, which have been advocated by both sides of the house, allow private firms to bid on transportation projects, build and maintain the project for a set amount of time, and recover costs through tolls or set state payments.

Proponents of tolling argue that it makes sense to charge motorists for the roads they use, as opposed to charging people at the pump with a gas tax increase to pay for deteriorating roads.

“Not all states might have the freedom or political will” to raise the gas tax, Jones said. “But some say we might be willing to pay a toll.”

Jones emphasised that only toll projects that make sense, such as in areas with high traffic volumes, are likely to be financed.

“Tolling is a powerful and effective tool for development, but they have to be well considered projects that make sense,” he said.

For more information on companies in this article

Related Content

  • China plans more ITS deployment despite economic slowdown
    March 30, 2017
    The Chinese government is turning to ITS to help solve urban traffic congestion in the majority of its large cities. Eugene Gerden reports. China is investing an estimated 3.5bn yuan ($551 million) per year in ITS and while the country’s current economic strategy may see this decline, the government plans to continue active development of the national intelligent transport system.
  • Economic stimulus and investment in ITS solutions
    February 2, 2012
    Scott Belcher, President and CEO of ITS America looks at the year ahead
  • Smarter Transport Pricing project gets underway in Auckland
    June 9, 2017
    The New Zealand Government and Auckland Council have begun a project to investigate smarter transport pricing in Auckland.
  • Congressmen debate funding at ITS America breakfast
    June 2, 2015
    The need for sustainable surface transportation funding was debated at the Legislative Breakfast held on the first day of ITS America’s 2015 Annual Meeting & Expo. There was unanimity between congressmen Tim Murphy (R-PA), Bill Johnson (R-OH) and Keith Rothfus (R-PA) that the current two-month extension to MAP-21 of the Highway Trust Fund was highly unsatisfactory – indeed Johnson described the last few years as a string of “Band-Aid fixes”. All agreed that a long-term sustainable solution is required, alth