Skip to main content

Upgrading New Yorks's traffic signal timings

The New York City Department of Transportation instituted the Midtown in Motion project to promote multimodal mobility in the Midtown Core of Manhattan, a 110 square block area or “zone” from Second to Sixth Avenue and 42nd to 57th Street. Control extended from 86th Street to 23rd Street, focused on the core zone. MiM provides signal timing changes on two levels: Level 1 control starts from a pre-stored library of timing plans. These are designed offline and are relevant to arterials inside the Midtown stud
February 28, 2013 Read time: 3 mins
The programme of upgrading intersection traffic signals has been one of three main building blocks in New York’s modernization plan (Pic: Aftab Uzzaman)
The 5590 New York City Department of Transportation instituted the Midtown in Motion project to promote multimodal mobility in the Midtown Core of Manhattan, a 110 square block area or “zone” from Second to Sixth Avenue and 42nd to 57th Street. Control extended from 86th Street to 23rd Street, focused on the core zone.

MiM provides signal timing changes on two levels: Level 1 control starts from a pre-stored library of timing plans. These are designed offline and are relevant to arterials inside the Midtown study area. As a result of applying these specially designed timing plans, traffic progression patterns are adjusted, serving the overall purpose of regulating traffic into Midtown, thereby enhancing mobility inside the study area.

Level 1 control of the system alerts operators in the NYCDOT Traffic Management Centre (TMC) to changes in travel time and ve­hicle speed and recommends signal timing adjustments. The opera­tor then reviews video cameras and other sources of information in the vicinity of the flagged avenue to identify the cause for the change in travel time. The TMC supervisor then decides the appropriate course of action to handle the event, which could be signal timing adjustments or requesting that NYPD address the situation.

To evaluate the system’s performance, a comparison of travel time by roadway segments was carried out. Based on the testing to date, in general the average speed improved noticeably. Speeds on approaches to the zone reduced to some degree as expected. Overall (inside and outside the zone) speeds improved, however.

Level 2 control is a split adjustment based on Severity Index (SI) which is related to an estimate of queue length (traffic congestion) by approach. The longer the queue is, the bigger the SI. The control algorithm attempts to reallocate green time between approaches to reduce queuing if possible and to achieve equity between the ap­proaches. Under the current implementation, the splits are adjusted at every third signal cycle.

Level 2 can reduce queuing while achieving equity during the period, where feasible. This will vary by intersection. Level 2 imple­mentation suggests that there are intervals wherein the ‘splits’ (time allocated for the green signal) can be adjusted to better service either the avenue or crosstown street, which is part of the objectives of MiM.

The extensive sensor network is enabling a rich data archive to be built. Combined with the record of actions taken and experience gained, this data will allow new traffic management plans to be de­veloped.

The data now available due to the city’s ITS sensor network, suit­ably analysed and combined with operational experience, confirms a basic principle – that significant variation in the zone is the norm. While there are clear aggregate patterns, daily fluctuations require active traffic management that is designed to anticipate that reality.

  • This is an edited extract from a paper presented by NYCDOT deputy director for systems engineering, Mohamad Talas, at the 19th ITS World Congress in Vienna, Austria, in October 2012. For a copy of the full paper, email %$Linker: 2 Email <?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-16"?><dictionary /> 0 0 0 oLinkEmail [email protected] NYCTOT false mailto:[email protected] true false%>.

For more information on companies in this article

Related Content

  • QVision enters the ITS market with $250,000 giveaway at ITS America 2013
    April 22, 2013
    ITS veterans know it’s nearly impossible to come away from the annual exposition without a suitcase filled with company branded key chains, pens and thumb drives. Its just one of many perks of coming to the show. However, newcomer QVision is upping the ante, giving away two packages of its Live Loop Video traffic systems to conference goers a $250,000 value.
  • Hurricane preparedness and crash reduction projects among inaugural NOCoE award winners
    November 30, 2018
    A project to avert transport chaos in hurricane season and a programme which led to a huge reduction in road crashes were among the big winners in a new US awards scheme. The US National Operations Center of Excellence (NOCoE)’s inaugural Transportation Systems Management and Operations (TSMO) Awards were open to cities, counties, metropolitan or rural planning organisations, state departments of transportation (DoTs) and private companies.
  • A warm welcome to CARTES Secure Connexions Event 2013
    November 19, 2013
    Welcome to this 28th edition of CARTES Secure Connexions Event - nearly 30 years of enabling global synergies at a human and technological level CARTES is the world’s leading exhibition dedicated to secure solutions for payment, identification and mobility. Since its creation in Paris in 1985, CARTES has become the industry’s premier show – and this 2013 edition brings together more than 450 exhibitors who have come to present their products and services to 20,000 visitors from 140 countries.
  • Australia’s laws are ‘not ready for driverless vehicles’
    May 13, 2016
    Australia’s National Transport Commission (NTC) has released Regulatory Options for Automated Vehicles, a discussion paper that finds a number of legislative barriers to increasing vehicle automation. The paper proposes that there are barriers that need to be addressed as soon as possible to ensure clarity around the status of more automated vehicles on Australia’s roads and to support further trials. In the longer term other legislative barriers will need to be addressed to allow fully driverless vehic