Skip to main content

We know that ITS can reduce road deaths - this is a moral issue

If you live in one of the world’s poor countries you are three times more likely to die in a road accident than if you live in a richer country. This sobering finding comes from the latest World Health Organisation report on road safety (p41). That simply isn’t good enough. As WHO points out, proven solutions are available to improve the chilling statistics. These include better legislation and strong enforcement, of course, but technology must also be part of the mix. This is an economic issue - but it’s
May 8, 2019 Read time: 2 mins
If you live in one of the world’s poor countries you are three times more likely to die in a road accident than if you live in a richer country. This sobering finding comes from the latest World Health Organisation report on road safety (p41). That simply isn’t good enough. As WHO points out, proven solutions are available to improve the chilling statistics. These include better legislation and strong enforcement, of course, but technology must also be part of the mix.


This is an economic issue - but it’s a moral one, too. Moreover, it is a timely reminder that the ITS industry has the power to help stem the tide of misery. It cannot be right that poorer states have 1% of the world’s vehicles but 13% of all vehicle-related deaths; while richer countries have 40% of the world’s cars – but only 7% of total traffic fatalities. Road traffic accident is now the biggest killer of young people, and the eighth overall leading cause of death worldwide – above even HIV/AIDS and tuberculosis. There is another way.

There are other ethical dilemmas in this issue of ITS International. An increasing wealth of information is available to create personalised transport solutions – and this makes for some exciting possibilities. But hang on a minute: does everyone really know what they’ve signed up for? ITS companies have a duty to be explicit in explaining how data is going to be used (p44). Otherwise, a backlash is coming.

Finally, the gig economy is reshaping not only the way we think about travel (Uber, anyone?) or pizza delivery (there are many apps for that, inevitably), but also about enforcement. Roads are no longer simply routes for allowing us to get from A to B – they are also now high-pressure workplaces for many people (p28). And because job security is scarce, getting that delivery done on time is vital. So tiredness, speed limits and all the other rules of the road might just take a backseat. Times are changing.

The authorities – and the rest of us - have some thinking to do.

Related Content

  • Transit in a time of protest
    July 13, 2020
    Street demonstrations at times create tricky balancing acts for public transportation providers - and the recent Black Lives Matter protests have also put a spotlight on the deeper problem of ‘infrastructural racism’…
  • Transport can build legacy of hope
    November 30, 2020
    Racial and social injustice has come to the fore this year. Samuel Johnson, IBTTA president and Transportation Corridor Agencies CEO, explains what the industry can do to build ‘a legacy of hope and progress’
  • Monitoring and transparency preserve enforcement's reputation
    July 30, 2012
    What can be done to preserve automated enforcement's reputation in the face of media and public criticism? Here, system manufacturers and suppliers talk about what they think are the most appropriate business models. Recent events in Italy only served to once again to push automated enforcement into the media spotlight. At the heart of the matter were the numerous alleged instances of local authorities and their contract suppliers of enforcement services colluding to illegally shorten amber signal phase tim
  • ITS investment on upward curve
    August 17, 2022
    More money is coming into the ITS sector – but where is it likely to go next? And what are the pros and cons of all this cash? Adam Hill talks to ITS veteran and corporate investment adviser Greg McKhann