We know that ITS can reduce road deaths - this is a moral issue

If you live in one of the world’s poor countries you are three times more likely to die in a road accident than if you live in a richer country. This sobering finding comes from the latest World Health Organisation report on road safety (p41). That simply isn’t good enough. As WHO points out, proven solutions are available to improve the chilling statistics. These include better legislation and strong enforcement, of course, but technology must also be part of the mix. This is an economic issue - but it’s
May 8, 2019 Read time: 2 mins
If you live in one of the world’s poor countries you are three times more likely to die in a road accident than if you live in a richer country. This sobering finding comes from the latest World Health Organisation report on road safety (p41). That simply isn’t good enough. As WHO points out, proven solutions are available to improve the chilling statistics. These include better legislation and strong enforcement, of course, but technology must also be part of the mix.


This is an economic issue - but it’s a moral one, too. Moreover, it is a timely reminder that the ITS industry has the power to help stem the tide of misery. It cannot be right that poorer states have 1% of the world’s vehicles but 13% of all vehicle-related deaths; while richer countries have 40% of the world’s cars – but only 7% of total traffic fatalities. Road traffic accident is now the biggest killer of young people, and the eighth overall leading cause of death worldwide – above even HIV/AIDS and tuberculosis. There is another way.

There are other ethical dilemmas in this issue of ITS International. An increasing wealth of information is available to create personalised transport solutions – and this makes for some exciting possibilities. But hang on a minute: does everyone really know what they’ve signed up for? ITS companies have a duty to be explicit in explaining how data is going to be used (p44). Otherwise, a backlash is coming.

Finally, the gig economy is reshaping not only the way we think about travel (Uber, anyone?) or pizza delivery (there are many apps for that, inevitably), but also about enforcement. Roads are no longer simply routes for allowing us to get from A to B – they are also now high-pressure workplaces for many people (p28). And because job security is scarce, getting that delivery done on time is vital. So tiredness, speed limits and all the other rules of the road might just take a backseat. Times are changing.

The authorities – and the rest of us - have some thinking to do.

Related Content

  • Silos are last century’s thinking
    April 21, 2016
    After 45 years in transportation, Ken Philmus sees the need for major change in a sector currently ill-prepared to meet the challenge of funding and rapidly advancing technological change. Having worked in both the public and private sectors, Ken Philmus, currently senior vice president of transportation solutions at Xerox, appreciates both approaches, but times are changing and he believes the sector needs to change too. “I like trains, planes and automobiles but I love the concept of mobility and that’s w
    Read More
  • To charge or not to charge, that is the question
    January 26, 2018
    Alan Dron looks at why congestion charging and other similar schemes are so controversial in North America. In August, Andrew Cuomo, governor of New York State, described congestion charging for the city as “an idea whose time had come,” according to the Bloomberg wire service. In October, he announced a ‘Fix NYC’ advisory panel to study methods of easing congestion on the city’s streets. Although Cuomo did not specifically mention congestion charging when setting up the panel, he said it would study
    Read More
  • Sandra Phillips of Movmi: ‘We’re all trying to get people moving without a car’
    April 30, 2021
    Movmi founder Sandra Phillips talks to Adam Hill about why transport integration is sometimes a matter of trust – and how to empower women in transportation
    Read More
  • Legalities of in-vehicle systems and cooperative infrastructures
    February 1, 2012
    Paul Laurenza of Dykema Gossett PLLC discusses the paths which lawmakers may go down on the route to making in-vehicle systems and cooperative infrastructures a reality. The question of whether or not to mandate in-vehicle systems for safety and other applications is a vexed one. There is a presumption on some parts that going down the road of forcing systems' fitment is somehow too domineering or restricting. Others would argue that it is the only realistic way of ensuring that systems achieve widespread d
    Read More

Highlighted Content