We know that ITS can reduce road deaths - this is a moral issue

If you live in one of the world’s poor countries you are three times more likely to die in a road accident than if you live in a richer country. This sobering finding comes from the latest World Health Organisation report on road safety (p41). That simply isn’t good enough. As WHO points out, proven solutions are available to improve the chilling statistics. These include better legislation and strong enforcement, of course, but technology must also be part of the mix. This is an economic issue - but it’s
May 8, 2019 Read time: 2 mins
If you live in one of the world’s poor countries you are three times more likely to die in a road accident than if you live in a richer country. This sobering finding comes from the latest World Health Organisation report on road safety (p41). That simply isn’t good enough. As WHO points out, proven solutions are available to improve the chilling statistics. These include better legislation and strong enforcement, of course, but technology must also be part of the mix.


This is an economic issue - but it’s a moral one, too. Moreover, it is a timely reminder that the ITS industry has the power to help stem the tide of misery. It cannot be right that poorer states have 1% of the world’s vehicles but 13% of all vehicle-related deaths; while richer countries have 40% of the world’s cars – but only 7% of total traffic fatalities. Road traffic accident is now the biggest killer of young people, and the eighth overall leading cause of death worldwide – above even HIV/AIDS and tuberculosis. There is another way.

There are other ethical dilemmas in this issue of ITS International. An increasing wealth of information is available to create personalised transport solutions – and this makes for some exciting possibilities. But hang on a minute: does everyone really know what they’ve signed up for? ITS companies have a duty to be explicit in explaining how data is going to be used (p44). Otherwise, a backlash is coming.

Finally, the gig economy is reshaping not only the way we think about travel (Uber, anyone?) or pizza delivery (there are many apps for that, inevitably), but also about enforcement. Roads are no longer simply routes for allowing us to get from A to B – they are also now high-pressure workplaces for many people (p28). And because job security is scarce, getting that delivery done on time is vital. So tiredness, speed limits and all the other rules of the road might just take a backseat. Times are changing.

The authorities – and the rest of us - have some thinking to do.

Related Content

  • Enforcement needs automation and communication
    February 1, 2012
    TISPOL's Peter van de Beek questions whether the thought processes which drive enforcement technology development are always the right ones. Peter van de Beek sees an ever-greater role for technology in traffic enforcement but is concerned that the emphasis of technological development and discussion is not always in the right places. 'Old-fashioned' face-to-face policing remains as valid as it ever did, he feels, but adds that there should be greater communication with those engaged at the sharp end of saf
    Read More
  • Will standardisation increase ITS interoperability?
    February 1, 2012
    Theoretical balance Kallistratos Dionelis, secretary general of ASECAP, comments on the European Commission's new ICT Standardisation Work Programme. I've just read a proposal from the European Commission on the 2010-2013 ICT Standardisation Work Programme. As ASECAP Secretary General this is one of my responsibilities. I work to receive information, to disseminate information and to build bridges and mutual understanding between policy-makers and the industrial world, between ASECAP and others.
    Read More
  • Marc Williams, Texas DoT: 'We need to end this streak of daily death'
    April 26, 2023
    Texas DoT’s road safety campaign #EndTheStreakTX is part of a plan to reduce traffic deaths to zero in the Lone Star State by 2050. The agency’s executive director Marc Williams explains why it’s needed…
    Read More
  • London needs just one road user charge, says report
    July 8, 2019
    London’s patchwork of road charging schemes should be replaced by a single, distance-based user charge, according to new research. Apart from anything else, it would be much fairer… The UK capital’s multiple road charging schemes require a radical overhaul, according to a new report by the Centre for London thinktank. The suggested solution is to replace existing levies on drivers with a single, distance-based user charge which would more fairly reflect how much, and at what time, people are using London
    Read More

Highlighted Content