Transport policy doesn’t operate in a vacuum

Intertraffic offers traffic planners and other transportation professionals the opportunity to view and find out about the latest cutting-edge technology in the market. Behind the scenes, engineers have been working away to solve the technical problems traffic planners are facing and some they didn’t even know they had. Indeed it seems the technology is now available for authorities to do almost anything: to detect, select, identify, measure, charge, prosecute, influence and inform the travelling public.
April 7, 2014 Read time: 3 mins
70 Intertraffic offers traffic planners and other transportation professionals the opportunity to view and find out about the latest cutting-edge technology in the market. Behind the scenes, engineers have been working away to solve the technical problems traffic planners are facing and some they didn’t even know they had. Indeed it seems the technology is now available for authorities to do almost anything: to detect, select, identify, measure, charge, prosecute, influence and inform the travelling public.

However, there is a danger, increasingly highlighted, that the technology is running ahead of the pace that the travelling public is willing and able to accept or understand. Simply because a transport related scheme is now technically possible, it does not mean it is publically acceptable. There has already been a ruling against the ‘unjustified’ use of ANPR/ALPR (ITS International Sept/Oct 2013), the French Ecotax is now on the back burner after widespread protests and recent exposés of government eavesdropping has unsettled many individuals across the globe. 
 
In some instances additional efforts to communicate the aims and benefits of a transport scheme can overcome an inbuilt public resistance to change - but the industry has something of a poor record in this area; take the example of speed and red light cameras. In other cases it may be that regardless of the amount of explanation, a proposed scheme remains unacceptable and a rethink is necessary.

As you will read in this issue, there is potential for the application of ITS to be socially divisive while in another feature we see that in cities around the world the demand for mobility is set to increase threefold. Doing nothing is not an option.
As always the technology is neutral – it does not impose a rule, it only enforces it – and going forward traffic planners will not have the luxury (if they ever did) of operating in a traffic bubble. Although they may not be the decision-makers, increasingly traffic planners will not only have to understand the technology of a proposed scheme, but also the wider effects such a scheme could have on the travelling public and so inform decision-makers accordingly.

Should the politicians decide to implement a scheme that could provoke negative reactions (well founded or not), traffic planners will have to up their game in informing the public of the scheme’s benefits as well as considering other measures to mitigate the negative effects.    

So while viewing the equipment on display at Intertraffic, or reading about it in our daily online updates at %$Linker: 2 External <?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-16"?><dictionary /> 0 0 0 oLinkExternal www.intertrafficlive.com Intertraffic false http://www.intertrafficlive.com/ false false%>, thought must not only go into applying the technology but how this can be done in an acceptable way.

Just another thing to think about as you enjoy the show.

For more information on companies in this article

Related Content

  • CILT urges policy review for London Mayor’s transport strategy
    October 4, 2017
    The Mayor of London’s Draft Transport Strategy (DMTS) lacks realism and risks unintended consequences, according to a report from the Charted Institute of Logistics and Transport (CILT). Proposals on bus priority require a fundamental review as speeds on a third of London’s bus routes have fallen more than 5% in the past year, including a reallocation of road space, construction works (with resulting congestion) and an increase in the volume of private hire and van traffic. CILT calls for bus corridors
    Read More
  • UK readiness for AVs depends on gender, age and location, says Fujitsu
    November 27, 2018
    The UK’s readiness to use a ride from a driverless car depends on gender, age and where you live, says a new report from Fujitsu. In a study of 2,000 members of the British public and 600 senior business decision makers, Fujitsu has discovered that transport is second only to education as the sector people are most keen to see transformed by technology. Despite this, there remains some ‘discomfort’ surrounding autonomous vehicles (AV). Less than a third of respondents would be happy to be picked up by a
    Read More
  • Insights into Mobility as a Service
    March 19, 2018
    Mobility as a Service (MaaS) is one of, if not the, biggest changes in the transport sector for many decades and ITS International’s stand is the place find out everything there is to know about MaaS - from concept to delivery. Having already run two successful MaaS Market conferences in London, the company is at Intertraffic highlighting its first US conference which is being run with the support of City of Atlanta and Georgia’s State Road & Tollway Authority. The US conference will take place in Atlanta
    Read More
  • Australian tolling forum attracts international speakers
    April 16, 2014
    Tolling experts from Australia, Asia, Europe and the USA will address the National Electronic Tolling Committee Industry Forum to be held in Sydney, Australia from 27 to 29 May 2014. More than 120 tolling industry executives from government policy makers, infrastructure providers, toll road operators, and equipment, technology and service suppliers make this the Asia Pacific region’s largest tolling conference. The Forum theme Tolling into the Future will cover infrastructure, charging, collection, e
    Read More

Highlighted Content