Transport policy doesn’t operate in a vacuum

Intertraffic offers traffic planners and other transportation professionals the opportunity to view and find out about the latest cutting-edge technology in the market. Behind the scenes, engineers have been working away to solve the technical problems traffic planners are facing and some they didn’t even know they had. Indeed it seems the technology is now available for authorities to do almost anything: to detect, select, identify, measure, charge, prosecute, influence and inform the travelling public.
April 7, 2014 Read time: 3 mins
70 Intertraffic offers traffic planners and other transportation professionals the opportunity to view and find out about the latest cutting-edge technology in the market. Behind the scenes, engineers have been working away to solve the technical problems traffic planners are facing and some they didn’t even know they had. Indeed it seems the technology is now available for authorities to do almost anything: to detect, select, identify, measure, charge, prosecute, influence and inform the travelling public.

However, there is a danger, increasingly highlighted, that the technology is running ahead of the pace that the travelling public is willing and able to accept or understand. Simply because a transport related scheme is now technically possible, it does not mean it is publically acceptable. There has already been a ruling against the ‘unjustified’ use of ANPR/ALPR (ITS International Sept/Oct 2013), the French Ecotax is now on the back burner after widespread protests and recent exposés of government eavesdropping has unsettled many individuals across the globe. 
 
In some instances additional efforts to communicate the aims and benefits of a transport scheme can overcome an inbuilt public resistance to change - but the industry has something of a poor record in this area; take the example of speed and red light cameras. In other cases it may be that regardless of the amount of explanation, a proposed scheme remains unacceptable and a rethink is necessary.

As you will read in this issue, there is potential for the application of ITS to be socially divisive while in another feature we see that in cities around the world the demand for mobility is set to increase threefold. Doing nothing is not an option.
As always the technology is neutral – it does not impose a rule, it only enforces it – and going forward traffic planners will not have the luxury (if they ever did) of operating in a traffic bubble. Although they may not be the decision-makers, increasingly traffic planners will not only have to understand the technology of a proposed scheme, but also the wider effects such a scheme could have on the travelling public and so inform decision-makers accordingly.

Should the politicians decide to implement a scheme that could provoke negative reactions (well founded or not), traffic planners will have to up their game in informing the public of the scheme’s benefits as well as considering other measures to mitigate the negative effects.    

So while viewing the equipment on display at Intertraffic, or reading about it in our daily online updates at %$Linker: 2 External <?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-16"?><dictionary /> 0 0 0 oLinkExternal www.intertrafficlive.com Intertraffic false http://www.intertrafficlive.com/ false false%>, thought must not only go into applying the technology but how this can be done in an acceptable way.

Just another thing to think about as you enjoy the show.

For more information on companies in this article

Related Content

  • AV ride-sharing services must appeal to motivations and overcome barriers
    April 18, 2018
    Autonomous vehicle (AV) ride-sharing services need to appeal to user motivations and overcome potential barriers or concerns, if they are to be successful, according to research conducted by Merge Greenwich. The study revealed that, on balance, ride-sharing presents a greater barrier-to-uptake than AV technology. 85% of respondents indicated a willingness to use an AV in the future, suggesting that the technology is the aspect of the service that excites them the most. 46% are willing to use a ride-shar
    Read More
  • Speed cameras targeted by French ‘yellow vest’ protesters
    January 14, 2019
    Protesters in France have put more than half of the country’s speed cameras out of action, according to the country’s authorities. Interior minister Christophe Castaner said that almost 60% of France’s 3,200 cameras have been affected, the BBC reports. Castaner said that the cameras had been “neutralised, attacked, or destroyed” by ‘yellow vest’ protesters in a move which threatened road safety. Motorists are required by law to keep high-visibility vests, or ‘gilets jaunes’ in their cars. These yel
    Read More
  • Bournemouth council urges residents to avoid social media ‘taxi’ service
    November 21, 2018
    People in the UK resort of Bournemouth are being warned not to use a ‘lifts-for-cash’ service which is operating in the town. A closed Facebook group called ‘Bournemouth & Poole town lifts’ has more than 7,000 members but council leaders say the service could be illegal. Members communicate via social media. Once accepted, they can ask for trips, talk to drivers or make money by using their vehicle as a taxi. But Nananka Randle, licensing team manager, planning and regulatory services, at Bournemouth Bo
    Read More
  • SVS-Vistek unveils ultra-high resolution camera
    March 21, 2018
    SVS-Vistek is showcasing a new, ultra-high resolution camera capable of taking photographs of up to 120 megapixels for ANPR purposes. The camera’s resolution is so great that it can be placed some distance from the scene – at the top of a high building, for example – and carry out ANPR surveillance over several streets simultaneously. Speed or red light enforcement are among the potential uses. The typical range of cameras used for ANPR purposes is five to 20 megapixels.
    Read More

Highlighted Content