Skip to main content

Speak up for Transportation

Transportation is often blamed for many of the world’s ills and some of it is undeniable, such as 1.2 million road deaths a year or poor urban air quality shortening the lives of those with heart or lung problems. However, every incident has many contributing factors. Sometimes transport may indeed be the biggest contributor – but it is almost always the easiest target because it is always simpler to blame machines than people.
December 11, 2017 Read time: 2 mins
Transportation is often blamed for many of the world’s ills and some of it is undeniable, such as 1.2 million road deaths a year or poor urban air quality shortening the lives of those with heart or lung problems. However, every incident has many contributing factors. Sometimes transport may indeed be the biggest contributor – but it is almost always the easiest target because it is always simpler to blame machines than people.

Transport is not the ‘necessary evil’ many would have us believe – a necessity, yes, but evil, no.     

It is against this background that I am delighted that this issue carries so many potential solutions to these ills: products to counter road crashes and deaths – be they caused by distracted drivers or incidents in tunnels, new ways to monitor (and strategies to improve) urban air quality and new car-sharing methods which can cut congestion, costs and emissions.

Furthermore, there are projects to look at using electric vehicles to help counter the mismatch between electricity production and consumption, improvements in enabling disabled people to use public transport and trials of technology to help prevent pedestrians being struck by trains.

While there is still much work to be done, transportation itself has progressed far beyond simply moving people and goods around ‘at any cost’ and is becoming cleaner and safer, and will increasingly make a positive contribution to society in many other ways.  

So don’t let the naysayers go unchallenged. Speak up for a sector that is at the leading edge of so many advances.

Related Content

  • Lack of progress in reducing drink-drive deaths has gone on too long says IAM RoadSmart
    February 3, 2017
    The UK’s independent road safety charity IAM RoadSmart has expressed disappointment in yet another year of no significant change in the levels of drink-driving in Britain, based on new Government statistics just announced. The Department for Transport announced that provisional estimates for 2015 show 220 deaths in alcohol related crashes. Some 1,380 people were killed or seriously injured when at least one driver was over the limit. This represents a statistically significant rise from 1,310 in 2014. In
  • Xerox takes youthful view of future transport
    August 23, 2016
    Xerox’s David Cummins talks to Colin Sowman about the lessons for city authorities from its survey of younger peoples’ attitude to transport. There can be no better way to get a handle on the future of transport demand than to ask the younger generation about how they view and consume today’s transport. Sociologists have called this group Generation Z – those born between 1995 and 2007 – which will make up 40% of all US consumers by 2020.
  • Tier board calls for e-scooter speed limit 
    July 16, 2021
    96% of blind or partially sighted people worry about e-scooters being silent, says report
  • Positive incentives an alternative to road user charging?
    February 1, 2012
    The Netherlands has been looking at incentivising rush-hour avoidance. The intention is to better understand road users' motivations and find alternatives to congestion charging. Something significant needs to happen if we are to adequately address the traffic congestion and other issues caused by the ever-rising numbers of vehicles on our roads. Congestion or distance-based charging is seen as one way of managing demand and raising revenue for improvements to transport infrastructure. However, charging is