Skip to main content

Same old mistakes? Try something new

There’s nothing for it: we need to talk about Mobility as a Service (MaaS). The late Stephen Hawking’s publisher once told him that his readership would be cut in half for every equation he put in a book. Well, here goes nothing… One of the most famous equations in physics is Isaac Newton’s Second Law of Motion: Force = mass x acceleration. With a little tweaking, I think we
June 28, 2018 Read time: 2 mins

There’s nothing for it: we need to talk about Mobility as a Service (MaaS). The late Stephen Hawking’s publisher once told him that his readership would be cut in half for every equation he put in a book. Well, here goes nothing… One of the most famous equations in physics is Isaac Newton’s Second Law of Motion:

Force = mass x acceleration

With a little tweaking, I think we could apply this to the current state of urban roads throughout the world. After all, acceleration is what we dream of when sitting in a jam – and MaaS has the ability to be a force for real change in transportation. Oh, please yourselves. But consider this: the latest MaaS Market conference was held in Atlanta – the fourth-most congested city in the US, where drivers spend 70 hours of each year in peak-time queues. What a spirit-sapping waste of time that is. Things don’t have to be like that. However, rather than promoting MaaS migration, we could simply carry on organising our transport systems in the same old ways. It is very easy to repeat the mistakes of the past – it’s comforting, even. Developments such as autonomous vehicles are exciting. However, they do not magically clear congested streets - they may even do the opposite. There is also no point demonising the car: it has a part to play. No-one but a zealot pretends there is a single answer to any mobility problem that cities face - and there are no zealots among ITS International readers, all of whom are sensible people. But MaaS is a major new tool in the ITS box of tricks, and represents something genuinely different. It would be stupid to ignore it.

Related Content

  • Advancing traffic management for smart cities
    September 3, 2024
    Promises of increased safety, less pollution, increased productivity and a better quality of life in smart cities are just too good to be ignored. Dany Longval of Teledyne Flir talks through some of the challenges
  • Future of US cooperative infrastructure networks
    July 31, 2012
    Peter H. Appel, the new Administrator of the USDOT's Research and Innovative Technology Administration, on his vision of the US's future cooperative infrastructure networks. Peter H. Appel comes to the post of Administrator of the US Department of Transportation's Research and Innovative Technology Administration (RITA) from a background in transportation-related work which stretches back over 20 years. Most recently with management consultancy A. T. Kearney, Inc., where he focused on busin
  • The benefit of Lidar: touch, don’t look
    September 28, 2020
    The benefits of Lidar as a safety device for automobiles rather than as an enabler for AVs are easy to overlook – but Dr Jun Pei of Cepton Technologies tells Adam Hill why that would be a big mistake
  • A global standard for enforcement systems – is it necessary?
    May 30, 2013
    Jason Barnes speaks to leading figures from the automated enforcement sector about whether a truly international standard for automated enforcement systems is necessary or can ever be achieved. Recent reports of further press controversy in the US over automated enforcement (see ‘Focusing on accuracy?’, ITS International raise again the issue of standards and what constitutes ‘good enough’ in terms of system accuracy and overall solution effectiveness. Comparatively, automated enforcement has always expe