Skip to main content

Same old mistakes? Try something new

There’s nothing for it: we need to talk about Mobility as a Service (MaaS). The late Stephen Hawking’s publisher once told him that his readership would be cut in half for every equation he put in a book. Well, here goes nothing… One of the most famous equations in physics is Isaac Newton’s Second Law of Motion: Force = mass x acceleration. With a little tweaking, I think we
June 28, 2018 Read time: 2 mins

There’s nothing for it: we need to talk about Mobility as a Service (MaaS). The late Stephen Hawking’s publisher once told him that his readership would be cut in half for every equation he put in a book. Well, here goes nothing… One of the most famous equations in physics is Isaac Newton’s Second Law of Motion:

Force = mass x acceleration

With a little tweaking, I think we could apply this to the current state of urban roads throughout the world. After all, acceleration is what we dream of when sitting in a jam – and MaaS has the ability to be a force for real change in transportation. Oh, please yourselves. But consider this: the latest MaaS Market conference was held in Atlanta – the fourth-most congested city in the US, where drivers spend 70 hours of each year in peak-time queues. What a spirit-sapping waste of time that is. Things don’t have to be like that. However, rather than promoting MaaS migration, we could simply carry on organising our transport systems in the same old ways. It is very easy to repeat the mistakes of the past – it’s comforting, even. Developments such as autonomous vehicles are exciting. However, they do not magically clear congested streets - they may even do the opposite. There is also no point demonising the car: it has a part to play. No-one but a zealot pretends there is a single answer to any mobility problem that cities face - and there are no zealots among ITS International readers, all of whom are sensible people. But MaaS is a major new tool in the ITS box of tricks, and represents something genuinely different. It would be stupid to ignore it.

Related Content

  • Two seconds – the difference between life and death
    October 17, 2016
    Professor Donald Fisher has spent 15 years identifying factors that increase the crash risk of novice and older drivers. His findings highlight the difference between living and dying, Colin Sowman reports.
  • How safe are smart motorways?
    March 3, 2020
    A valiant attempt to ease the UK’s congested strategic road system? Or an idea that should never have seen the light of day? Alan Dron reports on the controversy over smart motorways...
  • Loop detection still has a part in traffic management
    March 2, 2012
    Bob Lees, co-founder of Diamond Consulting Services, on why the loop detector just refuses to go away. The more strident proponents of newer and emergent detection technologies are quick to highlight what they see as the disadvantages, and hence the imminent passing, of the humble inductive loop. The more prosaic will acknowledge that loops continue to have a part to play in traffic management, falling back on the assertion that it is all a question of application. And yet year after year the loop, despite
  • Asecap debates the future of tolling
    August 23, 2016
    Colin Sowman reports form Asecap’s Study & Information Days event in Madrid. At Asecap’s (the Association of European Toll Road Operators) recent Study and Information Days event there was no doubt about the subject at the top of the agenda: the European Union Directive 23/2014/EU. This will introduce fundamental changes to the concession model under which Asecap members operate more than 50,000km of tolled highways and, in response, it has compiled a report entitled Proposal for a Sustainable Concession Mo