Skip to main content

Navigating an uncertain 2017

There is no doubt that 2016 has seen some of the biggest political upheavals in recent times: The UK’s decision to leave the EU, America electing a non-politician – namely Donald Trump – as its president, an attempted coup in Turkey, Brazil’s president impeached… the list goes on.
December 6, 2016 Read time: 2 mins
There is no doubt that 2016 has seen some of the biggest political upheavals in recent times: The UK’s decision to leave the EU, America electing a non-politician – namely Donald Trump – as its president, an attempted coup in Turkey, Brazil’s president impeached… the list goes on.

For government departments, both national and local, the uncertainty this causes throws any non-committed spend into jeopardy and virtually paralyses the planning process while political direction, priorities and budgets are agreed. In the case of the UK and the EU (where France, Germany, Hungary and Slovenia have presidential elections and the Netherlands has a general election), this uncertainty could last years, not months.

The timing of such momentous upheavals could not be worse for the transport sector which is seeing its own ‘revolution’ in terms of increasing urbanisation and new travel options such as Mobility as a Service, along with technology changes like autonomous vehicles. For all those reasons and more, 2017 is going to be a particularly uncertain and challenging year for the global transportation sector.

But one thing remains certain; that people and goods will still need to travel and be transported efficiently. That fundamental necessity, along with a moral imperative to reduce the number of fatalities on the roads and railways, underpins everything the sector does and strives to achieve.

Those basic principles are unerring and do not change, regardless of which way the political winds are blowing. While the near future may be administratively difficult, focusing on those fundamental principles and ultimate goals will, perhaps, make those choppy waters a little easier to navigate.

Related Content

  • Debating road user charging systems
    January 26, 2012
    Are pre-launch trials of charging systems the way to improve public acceptance? Or is the real key a more robust political attitude? Here, leading system suppliers discuss the issue. The use of distance-based Road User Charging (RUC) is now well established, at least for heavy goods vehicles on strategic roads. However demand management for all vehicles, whether a distance-based charge or some form of cordon scheme, has yet to make significant progress. This is in spite of the logic and equity of RUC being
  • C-ITS in Europe: It’s the governance, stupid!
    March 3, 2023
    Cooperative ITS (C-ITS) is coming – in fact, it’s already here. But who has responsibility for making it work? Richard Lax of Kapsch TrafficCom thinks there are lessons to be learned from the European experience
  • The need to accelerate systems standardisation
    January 31, 2012
    While the US has achieved an appreciable level of success when it comes to implementation of standards-based systems at the urban and intersection control levels, the overall standards implementation effort is not progressing at anywhere near a level commensurate with the size of the country and its population, says Christy Peebles, business unit manager with Siemens Industry, Inc.'s Mobility Division. She attributes the situation to a number of factors: "There's a big element of 'Not Invented Here' syndro
  • Commercial vehicle cross-border enforcement needs muscle
    February 3, 2012
    A look at the current status of cross-border enforcement of commercial vehicle operation in the European Union and a look at what still needs to happen to realise a coherent working system