Skip to main content

Mobility from the travellers point of view

The latest generation of mobility apps such as GoLA should be compulsory viewing for all transportation professionals. Why? Because they show what travel looks like from a travellers’ point of view – including all modal options for getting from A to B.
June 8, 2016 Read time: 2 mins

The latest generation of mobility apps such as GoLA should be compulsory viewing for all transportation professionals. Why? Because they show what travel looks like from a travellers’ point of view – including all modal options for getting from A to B. 

What a sharp contrast to authorities’ traditional approach of carrying out endless analysis of congestion, travel times, service frequency, timetables and so on.  

This not only highlights how many options travellers have but also the comparative strengths and weakness of the various modes because, in the absence of any other overriding consideration, travellers are likely to choose the quickest and most convenient option. Call it the path of least resistance.

Punch in any number of start points and destinations and more often than not it will be faster to drive there than take any other mode of transport with all the associated air quality and congestion issues that raises. So instead of looking at a congestion problem and pondering how the road’s capacity can be increased, transport planners should be asking themselves ‘how can we provide travellers with other ways of reaching their destination in the same timescale?’

Indeed, the use of traditional thinking to reduce traffic congestion results in reducing the ‘resistance’ to travelling on that road and therefore more people will switch to using that route until the point where some sort of route or modal equilibrium is regained. The same is equally true of adding more buses or longer trains and so on, and this can be used to influence modal shifts. And this is increasingly the case in the the era of real-time travel information where commuters make travel decisions each day rather than habitually doing the same thing.

The influence of real-time travel information, mobility apps, satellite navigation and other user-based technology is only going to grow and Mobility as a Service (see page 15) is perhaps the end-game in this respect. Looking at transport from the traveller’s viewpoint will reshape authorities’ thinking and planning – and the sooner this starts the better.

Related Content

  • Frequency changes threaten vehicle safety applications
    January 24, 2012
    The use of frequency spectrum at 5.9GHz for vehicle safety applications is at risk because of two draft bills currently before Congress. Here, we look at why and what’s being done to address the issue. In the US, the right of cooperative infrastructure to use frequency at 5.9GHz is under threat as a result of the proposal of two bills in Congress. The chronology of spectrum allocation for Dedicated Short- Range Communications (DSRC)-based Vehicle-to-Infrastructure (V2I) and Vehicle-to-Vehicle (V2V) safety a
  • Free-flow tolling needs classification technology rethink
    February 2, 2012
    The move to all-electronic fee collection should be encouraging tolling authorities to look again at whether their vehicle classification criteria and technologies remain at all appropriate. Bob Lees of Idris Technology writes
  • US state of the art workzone safety
    January 25, 2012
    The Texas Transportation Institute's Jerry Ullman talks about the state of the art in work zone safety in the US. Work zones are places where, perhaps more than anywhere else on the road network, mobility and safety are strongly linked. Historically, field crews and contractors wanted vehicles in work zones to be moving as slowly as possible, assuming that made conditions the safest for work crews. We are though starting to see a shift in such thinking with the realisation that excessive delays or slow-down
  • Need for standardisation of toll classes
    March 2, 2012
    In a previous article Bob Lees of Idris Technology Ltd looked at the appropriateness of toll classes in relation to all-electronic toll fee collection. Here, he looks at how addressing classification standardisation could avoid downstream aggravation and cost