Skip to main content

Mobility from the travellers point of view

The latest generation of mobility apps such as GoLA should be compulsory viewing for all transportation professionals. Why? Because they show what travel looks like from a travellers’ point of view – including all modal options for getting from A to B.
June 8, 2016 Read time: 2 mins

The latest generation of mobility apps such as GoLA should be compulsory viewing for all transportation professionals. Why? Because they show what travel looks like from a travellers’ point of view – including all modal options for getting from A to B. 

What a sharp contrast to authorities’ traditional approach of carrying out endless analysis of congestion, travel times, service frequency, timetables and so on.  

This not only highlights how many options travellers have but also the comparative strengths and weakness of the various modes because, in the absence of any other overriding consideration, travellers are likely to choose the quickest and most convenient option. Call it the path of least resistance.

Punch in any number of start points and destinations and more often than not it will be faster to drive there than take any other mode of transport with all the associated air quality and congestion issues that raises. So instead of looking at a congestion problem and pondering how the road’s capacity can be increased, transport planners should be asking themselves ‘how can we provide travellers with other ways of reaching their destination in the same timescale?’

Indeed, the use of traditional thinking to reduce traffic congestion results in reducing the ‘resistance’ to travelling on that road and therefore more people will switch to using that route until the point where some sort of route or modal equilibrium is regained. The same is equally true of adding more buses or longer trains and so on, and this can be used to influence modal shifts. And this is increasingly the case in the the era of real-time travel information where commuters make travel decisions each day rather than habitually doing the same thing.

The influence of real-time travel information, mobility apps, satellite navigation and other user-based technology is only going to grow and Mobility as a Service (see page 15) is perhaps the end-game in this respect. Looking at transport from the traveller’s viewpoint will reshape authorities’ thinking and planning – and the sooner this starts the better.

Related Content

  • Trust is the key, says Cubic’s Crissy Ditmore
    August 7, 2019
    Trust is the key to encouraging people to take up shared mobility and MaaS services, thinks Cubic Transportation Systems’ Crissy Ditmore. She tells Adam Hill why sharing must be the way forward Crissy Ditmore is on the move. Director of strategy at Cubic Transportation Systems since September last year, she lives in Boise, Idaho, but doesn’t see a great deal of the city as she is “90% of the time on the road”. This is appropriate for someone whose business is working out how to get people from place to p
  • Machine vision standards definition moves forward with establishment of new forum
    December 3, 2012
    The new Future Standards Forum will homogenise standards develop in the machine vision and partnering sectors. Here, machine vision industry experts discuss developments. By Jason Barnes At the Vision Show, which took place in Stuttgart at the beginning of November, the European Machine Vision Association, the US’s Automated Imaging Association and the Japan Industrial Imaging Association (JIIA) established a joint initiative, the Future Standards Forum (FSF). This, said the EMVA’s President Toni Ventura, a
  • Informal transport moves emerging megacities
    August 11, 2020
    If you want to get to work in emerging markets, the chances are you may not be using traditional public transit lines. Devin de Vries of WhereIsMyTransport makes the case for informal networks
  • Autonomous driving – what can we really expect?
    June 6, 2016
    Dave Marples of Technolution BV looks beyond the hype to the practical implementation of autonomous vehicles. Having looked at the development of this sector for some time, I am concerned about the current state of autonomous driving development as engineering (and marketing) have run way ahead of the wider systemic, and legislative, requirements to support an autonomous future.