Skip to main content

Mobility from the travellers point of view

The latest generation of mobility apps such as GoLA should be compulsory viewing for all transportation professionals. Why? Because they show what travel looks like from a travellers’ point of view – including all modal options for getting from A to B.
June 8, 2016 Read time: 2 mins

The latest generation of mobility apps such as GoLA should be compulsory viewing for all transportation professionals. Why? Because they show what travel looks like from a travellers’ point of view – including all modal options for getting from A to B. 

What a sharp contrast to authorities’ traditional approach of carrying out endless analysis of congestion, travel times, service frequency, timetables and so on.  

This not only highlights how many options travellers have but also the comparative strengths and weakness of the various modes because, in the absence of any other overriding consideration, travellers are likely to choose the quickest and most convenient option. Call it the path of least resistance.

Punch in any number of start points and destinations and more often than not it will be faster to drive there than take any other mode of transport with all the associated air quality and congestion issues that raises. So instead of looking at a congestion problem and pondering how the road’s capacity can be increased, transport planners should be asking themselves ‘how can we provide travellers with other ways of reaching their destination in the same timescale?’

Indeed, the use of traditional thinking to reduce traffic congestion results in reducing the ‘resistance’ to travelling on that road and therefore more people will switch to using that route until the point where some sort of route or modal equilibrium is regained. The same is equally true of adding more buses or longer trains and so on, and this can be used to influence modal shifts. And this is increasingly the case in the the era of real-time travel information where commuters make travel decisions each day rather than habitually doing the same thing.

The influence of real-time travel information, mobility apps, satellite navigation and other user-based technology is only going to grow and Mobility as a Service (see page 15) is perhaps the end-game in this respect. Looking at transport from the traveller’s viewpoint will reshape authorities’ thinking and planning – and the sooner this starts the better.

Related Content

  • Report highlights community impact of new mobility options
    March 29, 2018
    Local authorities and communities must understand the impacts of the new mobility options and regulate to get the transport systems they want, according to a new report. Colin Sowman takes a look. Outside of the big cities plagued with congestion, the existing transportation system(s) often cope adequately, and the ongoing workload (maintenance, safety…) is more than enough to keep local transport authorities busy. Is it, therefore, a good use of public service employees’ time to keep abreast of the raft
  • Report highlights community impact of new mobility options
    March 29, 2018
    Local authorities and communities must understand the impacts of the new mobility options and regulate to get the transport systems they want, according to a new report. Colin Sowman takes a look. Outside of the big cities plagued with congestion, the existing transportation system(s) often cope adequately, and the ongoing workload (maintenance, safety…) is more than enough to keep local transport authorities busy. Is it, therefore, a good use of public service employees’ time to keep abreast of the raft
  • What's Next for Aimsun?
    October 4, 2023
    Aimsun is switching strategy from being a pure software firm to one that is focused on outcomes. The company’s CEO Alexandre Torday talks to Adam Hill and explains why
  • Assessing the potential of in-vehicle enforcement systems
    December 4, 2012
    Jason Barnes considers the social and ethical ramifications of using in-vehicle safety technologies to fulfil enforcement functions. Although policy documents often imply close correlation between enforcement, compliance and safety – in part, as a counter to accusations that enforcement is rather more concerned with revenue generation – there is a noticeable reluctance among policy makers and auto manufacturers to exploit in-vehicle safety systems for enforcement applications. From a technical perspective t