Skip to main content

Kistler showcases OIML-certified WIM technology

Kistler will use Intertraffic Amsterdam to highlight a major Weigh-in-Motion (WIM) innovation that has already won accreditation from the International Organisation of Metrology (OIML).
February 16, 2016 Read time: 2 mins

657 Kistler will use Intertraffic Amsterdam to highlight a major Weigh-in-Motion (WIM) innovation that has already won accreditation from the International Organisation of Metrology (OIML).

As the company points out, to address the ever increasing problem of pavement damage caused by heavy transport, WIM systems employing Kistler quartz sensors have been delivering valuable traffic data for many years. There is also a long tradition in using WIM for preselection of overloaded vehicles. However, the chain has been missing the last link that would allow the implementation of automatic enforcement, based on vehicle weight data, to introduce toll-by-weight models in a free-flow environment or to obtain legally compliant trading data for invoicing industrial goods loaded on trucks by weight. This growing demand for certified WIM systems accredited according to international standards has been recently met by Kistler’s OIML-certified WIM technology.


Kistler is the first WIM manufacturer to have received the International Organisation of Metrology (OIML) R-134 certificate for vehicle weighing with strip sensors. Supported by this certificate, the company’s WIM systems based on maintenance-free Lineas quartz WIM sensors and the Kistler WIM data logger can now be used for legal applications.

In the world of international WIM standards, the company says there is a significant difference in the definition of the accuracy classes. While COST323 and ASTM E1318 state that only 95% of WIM measurements need to fulfil the declared accuracy, the OIML requires all (100%) measurements to be in the requested accuracy class. The Kistler WIM system meets OIML accuracy F5 meaning that for initial verification all errors are below ±2.5 % and during standard operation the system has a measurement error smaller than ±5%.

For more information on companies in this article

Related Content

  • The benefits of combining enforcement and traffic management
    February 27, 2013
    Jason Barnes considers how combining enforcement equipment with other traffic management technologies might benefit our future – if only the will were really in place to do so. During the ITS World Congress in Vienna in October last year, Navtech Radar and Vysion­ics ITS announced a strategic partnership that would combine the expertise of Navtech in millimetre-wave wide-area surveillance technology with Vysionics’ machine vision-based automatic number plate recognition (ANPR) and average speed measurement
  • EVR and how best to do it
    June 10, 2015
    Kapsch TrafficCom’s Christoph Amlacher explains that the key to successful Electronic Vehicle Registration is to consider a deployment in its entirety — including enforcement. Electronic Vehicle Registration (EVR) shares much in common with large-scale city congestion charging, in that its benefits are numerous and obvious, and it has been a topic of lively discussion for a decade and more. Despite such manifest advantages and widespread interest, this has failed to translate into numerous large-scale deplo
  • Bluetooth speed and travel data collection shows cost savings
    February 2, 2012
    Houston TranStar is using Bluetooth sensors to collect speed and travel data in a project which is already demonstrating significant cost savings
  • Sick introduces Free Flow Profiler
    August 30, 2019
    Sick has released a vehicle measurement system which it says enables accurate 3D profiling of vehicles across multiple lanes in free-flow traffic.