Skip to main content

The future of mobility: designed for life

The future of mobility…sounds exciting, doesn’t it? But try to define it and you soon find it’s like putting a fence round a cloud. What will it look like? When will we get there? Who decides? And why are we still not wearing jetpacks? Maybe next year. The Royal College of Art in London does not seem like the most obvious place to look for hard-headed thinking on these things. But it has a long heritage in designing beautiful cars – and it is also home to the Intelligent Mobility Design Centre, which is lo
August 16, 2019 Read time: 2 mins
The future of mobility…sounds exciting, doesn’t it? But try to define it and you soon find it’s like putting a fence round a cloud. What will it look like? When will we get there? Who decides? And why are we still not wearing jetpacks? Maybe next year.

The Royal College of Art in London does not seem like the most obvious place to look for hard-headed thinking on these things. But it has a long heritage in designing beautiful cars – and it is also home to the Intelligent Mobility Design Centre, which is looking at the future of mobility with a very interesting question in mind: how will it make us feel? This is one that we don’t often ask, but it’s central to the success or otherwise of movements such as Mobility as a Service.

For the IMDC, one of the key factors in a transport solution is: how is it going to be better? It can’t just be convenient, it has to be comfortable. It must provide a positive experience, otherwise why make that choice? It would help if it looks good, too.

This could perhaps be described as the ‘softer’ side of ITS, the bit that realises something important: people need to be inspired. For instance, hyperloop has something of a James Bond feel to it, sort of retro cool: who wouldn’t want to be part of that? It may be years away but it’s worth waiting for. Most of the ways that we travel have been around for at least a century already – it’s time for a change.

Whatever you think of driverless cars, they will radically alter our ideas about what a car looks like. If there’s no driver, then we’re all passengers. And if we’re all passengers, then where will we sit – and what will we do?

As I say, exciting. The vision thing is vital – we shouldn’t overlook it. And some of us are still holding out for the jetpacks…

Related Content

  • Machine vision standards definition moves forward with establishment of new forum
    December 3, 2012
    The new Future Standards Forum will homogenise standards develop in the machine vision and partnering sectors. Here, machine vision industry experts discuss developments. By Jason Barnes At the Vision Show, which took place in Stuttgart at the beginning of November, the European Machine Vision Association, the US’s Automated Imaging Association and the Japan Industrial Imaging Association (JIIA) established a joint initiative, the Future Standards Forum (FSF). This, said the EMVA’s President Toni Ventura, a
  • Complementing traditional ITS with new technologies
    April 11, 2013
    For a long time, the ITS industry agonised over how to make itself better known to the public. There were pragmatic reasons for this – greater awareness of what it is and does leads to greater lobbying power, an important consideration for a small industry pitched against the might of the road-building fraternity in the fight for budgets – but there was also an element, it must be said, of just wanting to be ‘loved’. But that desire runs up against several realities. The first is that even ‘experts’ strugg
  • Voting for change - the democratisation of transportation
    December 8, 2014
    Contra Costa is using an innovative planning method to gather suggestions and craft future transportation spending plans. Public opinion in matters relating to transport rarely exceeds complaints about congestion on the roads, crowded metros, slow buses with ‘exorbitant’ fares or perhaps enforcement cameras.
  • Do we need a new approach to ITS and traffic management?
    January 31, 2012
    In an article which has implications for the European Electronic Toll Service, ASECAP's Kallistratos Dionelis asks whether the approach we currently take to major ITS system implementations is always the best or healthiest. I was asked recently to write a paper on the technology-oriented future of transport. To paraphrase, I started with: "The goal of European policy-makers is to establish a transport system which meets society's economic, social and environmental needs, satisfying in parallel a rising dema