Skip to main content

The future of mobility: designed for life

The future of mobility…sounds exciting, doesn’t it? But try to define it and you soon find it’s like putting a fence round a cloud. What will it look like? When will we get there? Who decides? And why are we still not wearing jetpacks? Maybe next year. The Royal College of Art in London does not seem like the most obvious place to look for hard-headed thinking on these things. But it has a long heritage in designing beautiful cars – and it is also home to the Intelligent Mobility Design Centre, which is lo
August 16, 2019 Read time: 2 mins
The future of mobility…sounds exciting, doesn’t it? But try to define it and you soon find it’s like putting a fence round a cloud. What will it look like? When will we get there? Who decides? And why are we still not wearing jetpacks? Maybe next year.

The Royal College of Art in London does not seem like the most obvious place to look for hard-headed thinking on these things. But it has a long heritage in designing beautiful cars – and it is also home to the Intelligent Mobility Design Centre, which is looking at the future of mobility with a very interesting question in mind: how will it make us feel? This is one that we don’t often ask, but it’s central to the success or otherwise of movements such as Mobility as a Service.

For the IMDC, one of the key factors in a transport solution is: how is it going to be better? It can’t just be convenient, it has to be comfortable. It must provide a positive experience, otherwise why make that choice? It would help if it looks good, too.

This could perhaps be described as the ‘softer’ side of ITS, the bit that realises something important: people need to be inspired. For instance, hyperloop has something of a James Bond feel to it, sort of retro cool: who wouldn’t want to be part of that? It may be years away but it’s worth waiting for. Most of the ways that we travel have been around for at least a century already – it’s time for a change.

Whatever you think of driverless cars, they will radically alter our ideas about what a car looks like. If there’s no driver, then we’re all passengers. And if we’re all passengers, then where will we sit – and what will we do?

As I say, exciting. The vision thing is vital – we shouldn’t overlook it. And some of us are still holding out for the jetpacks…

Related Content

  • IBTTA's Pat Jones: 'It’s about expanding people's comfort zone and mine as well'
    October 24, 2024
    For two decades, Pat Jones, has been executive director and CEO of IBTTA. As he approaches retirement at the end of this year, he talks to Adam Hill about a career spent ‘stretching and growing’ – and helping others to do the same
  • Xerox considers smarter city solutions
    October 14, 2016
    Richard Harris from Xerox considers how to alleviate inner-city traffic congestion. Whether travelling for business or leisure, wasting unnecessary time during your journey is a common source of frustration. From dealing with congestion, hold-ups caused by broken down vehicles or crashes to roadworks and other types of delay, wasting time is almost guaranteed to make most people experience additional stress before they even get to where they want to go.
  • Trust me, I'm a driverless car
    October 12, 2018
    Developing C/AV technology is the easy bit: now the vehicles need to gain people’s confidence. So does the public feel safe in driverless hands – and how much might they be willing to pay for the privilege? The Venturer consortium’s final user and technology test (Trial 3) explored levels of user trust in scenarios where a connected and autonomous vehicle (C/AV) is interacting with cyclists, pedestrians and other road users on a controlled road network. Trial 3 consisted of experimental runs in the
  • Assessing the potential of in-vehicle enforcement systems
    December 4, 2012
    Jason Barnes considers the social and ethical ramifications of using in-vehicle safety technologies to fulfil enforcement functions. Although policy documents often imply close correlation between enforcement, compliance and safety – in part, as a counter to accusations that enforcement is rather more concerned with revenue generation – there is a noticeable reluctance among policy makers and auto manufacturers to exploit in-vehicle safety systems for enforcement applications. From a technical perspective t