Skip to main content

The future of mobility: designed for life

The future of mobility…sounds exciting, doesn’t it? But try to define it and you soon find it’s like putting a fence round a cloud. What will it look like? When will we get there? Who decides? And why are we still not wearing jetpacks? Maybe next year. The Royal College of Art in London does not seem like the most obvious place to look for hard-headed thinking on these things. But it has a long heritage in designing beautiful cars – and it is also home to the Intelligent Mobility Design Centre, which is lo
August 16, 2019 Read time: 2 mins
The future of mobility…sounds exciting, doesn’t it? But try to define it and you soon find it’s like putting a fence round a cloud. What will it look like? When will we get there? Who decides? And why are we still not wearing jetpacks? Maybe next year.

The Royal College of Art in London does not seem like the most obvious place to look for hard-headed thinking on these things. But it has a long heritage in designing beautiful cars – and it is also home to the Intelligent Mobility Design Centre, which is looking at the future of mobility with a very interesting question in mind: how will it make us feel? This is one that we don’t often ask, but it’s central to the success or otherwise of movements such as Mobility as a Service.

For the IMDC, one of the key factors in a transport solution is: how is it going to be better? It can’t just be convenient, it has to be comfortable. It must provide a positive experience, otherwise why make that choice? It would help if it looks good, too.

This could perhaps be described as the ‘softer’ side of ITS, the bit that realises something important: people need to be inspired. For instance, hyperloop has something of a James Bond feel to it, sort of retro cool: who wouldn’t want to be part of that? It may be years away but it’s worth waiting for. Most of the ways that we travel have been around for at least a century already – it’s time for a change.

Whatever you think of driverless cars, they will radically alter our ideas about what a car looks like. If there’s no driver, then we’re all passengers. And if we’re all passengers, then where will we sit – and what will we do?

As I say, exciting. The vision thing is vital – we shouldn’t overlook it. And some of us are still holding out for the jetpacks…

Related Content

  • Sorting myth from reality in vehicle automation
    June 2, 2016
    Bob Denaro looks beyond the hype surrounding autonomous vehicles to the challenges that still need to be overcome. Automated vehicles (AVs) may be the perfect storm – in a positive way - with the automobile manufacturers, the government and consumers all embracing the emergence of a transformational new technology and product.
  • A new direction for the future of mobility?
    August 14, 2013
    Tesla and SpaceX CEO Elon Musk has unveiled his vision of a futuristic Hyperloop transport system this week, proposing to build a solar-powered network of crash-proof capsules that would whisk people from San Francisco to Los Angeles in half an hour. Musk says the Hyperloop is expected to be a closed-tube transport system not unlike the pneumatic delivery systems found in some old buildings, which use a pulse of air to move a capsule and cargo to a designated location. Based on what he has revealed to date,
  • Commuting habits come under scrutiny
    March 28, 2017
    Cities have a moral responsibility to encourage the smart use of transportation and Andrew Bardin Williams hears a few suggestions. Given the choice of getting a root canal, doing household chores, filing taxes, eating anchovies or commuting to work, nearly two-thirds of Americans said that they wouldn’t mind commuting into work—at least according to a poll conducted by Xerox (now Conduent) over its social media channels at the end of 2016.
  • Is road user charging the first stop for congestion management?
    July 23, 2012
    David Hytch, Information Systems Director at the Greater Manchester Public Transport Executive, considers just where congestion pricing schemes should sit in transport planners' hierarchy of options for managing demand. On the face of it, Greater Manchester in England's proposed congestion charging scheme hit just about every sweet spot possible when it came to convincing the general public of the need for and benefits of such a venture. There was the promise from national government of almost £3bn-worth of