Skip to main content

Forward thinking beats rear-guard action

In terms of vision, joined-up thinking and exploiting the potential of ITS, the authorities in Riyadh are showing how it should, and can, be done (see page 52). Faced with a fast-growing population and ever-increasing congestion, the city’s authorities decided the situation required a solution beyond the gains that can be made by deploying ITS alone, so it is adding a metro – a completely new travel mode.
April 20, 2016 Read time: 2 mins

In terms of vision, joined-up thinking and exploiting the potential of ITS, the authorities in Riyadh are showing how it should, and can, be done (see page 52).  Faced with a fast-growing population and ever-increasing congestion, the city’s authorities decided the situation required a solution beyond the gains that can be made by deploying ITS alone, so it is adding a metro – a completely new travel mode.

Not only that, it is doing so in double quick time with a five-year program and using some of the latest ITS technology to help drivers avoid the inevitable road closures and delays that will occur during the construction phase.

Now it is easy to say ‘they have the money’ or ‘their streets are not as old and narrow as ours and they don’t have all these protected buildings’ or ‘their residents don’t pay tax like our voters’, some or all of which may true. But in the end, with an unstoppable trend of urbanisation, it is evitable that sooner or later all big cities will need to deploy all the modal options. And if that is the case, is will be cheaper, more efficient and less painful to the travelling public to do so before the need becomes an absolute necessity. In that way any remaining capacity in the other modal options can be used to help minimise disruption while maximising the benefits in the shortest possible time.

A piecemeal approach to increasing capacity only when intervention is unavoidable will exacerbate and prolong discomfort for the travelling public and give the impression that the authority has no idea of how to tackle the city’s travel problems.  

Should you take the view ‘if we hold back and wait for a few years then autonomous vehicles will cure all our problems’,  reading the opinions of two experts in the field (see pages 62 and 64) may make you think again.

Caught between a tide of rising population, increasing urbanisation and ever-tighter budgetary constraints, today’s DOTs are no place for the feint hearted.

Related Content

  • Good money after bad
    February 27, 2012
    Fundamentally, as human beings, we tend to want much the same things
  • Trust AI – it knows more than we do
    January 14, 2020
    There’s no shortage of data – but making the most of it is the problem. Andrew Bunn examines how AI will be able to support and influence the development of advanced transportation strategies
  • Do buses need subsidies in congestion charging areas
    June 20, 2016
    David Crawford takes a look at the debate surrounding bus subsidies. Subsidies for public transport are a well-known and frequently-used policy tool directed at reducing the high environmental and social costs of peak-period traffic congestion. But at the end of last year the Swedish Centre for Transport Studies published a working paper entitled ‘Should buses still be subsidised in Stockholm?’ This concluded that the subsidy levels currently being applied in Stockholm could be nearly halved by setting bus
  • Reducing injuries and deaths in US workzones shouldn’t be this complicated
    April 17, 2023
    In National Work Zone Awareness Week, surely the least we can do is to help get road workers home safely at the end of the day, says One.network's boss