Skip to main content

Forward thinking beats rear-guard action

In terms of vision, joined-up thinking and exploiting the potential of ITS, the authorities in Riyadh are showing how it should, and can, be done (see page 52). Faced with a fast-growing population and ever-increasing congestion, the city’s authorities decided the situation required a solution beyond the gains that can be made by deploying ITS alone, so it is adding a metro – a completely new travel mode.
April 20, 2016 Read time: 2 mins

In terms of vision, joined-up thinking and exploiting the potential of ITS, the authorities in Riyadh are showing how it should, and can, be done (see page 52).  Faced with a fast-growing population and ever-increasing congestion, the city’s authorities decided the situation required a solution beyond the gains that can be made by deploying ITS alone, so it is adding a metro – a completely new travel mode.

Not only that, it is doing so in double quick time with a five-year program and using some of the latest ITS technology to help drivers avoid the inevitable road closures and delays that will occur during the construction phase.

Now it is easy to say ‘they have the money’ or ‘their streets are not as old and narrow as ours and they don’t have all these protected buildings’ or ‘their residents don’t pay tax like our voters’, some or all of which may true. But in the end, with an unstoppable trend of urbanisation, it is evitable that sooner or later all big cities will need to deploy all the modal options. And if that is the case, is will be cheaper, more efficient and less painful to the travelling public to do so before the need becomes an absolute necessity. In that way any remaining capacity in the other modal options can be used to help minimise disruption while maximising the benefits in the shortest possible time.

A piecemeal approach to increasing capacity only when intervention is unavoidable will exacerbate and prolong discomfort for the travelling public and give the impression that the authority has no idea of how to tackle the city’s travel problems.  

Should you take the view ‘if we hold back and wait for a few years then autonomous vehicles will cure all our problems’,  reading the opinions of two experts in the field (see pages 62 and 64) may make you think again.

Caught between a tide of rising population, increasing urbanisation and ever-tighter budgetary constraints, today’s DOTs are no place for the feint hearted.

Related Content

  • Interview: Jarrett Walker, author of Human Transit
    May 2, 2018
    Elon Musk has called him a ‘sanctimonious idiot’ but public transit expert Jarrett Walker tells Andrew Stone that more data and smarter cars aren't the answer to mass mobility...
  • Swarco: ‘Everyone’s running after buzzwords’
    April 1, 2019
    The ITS world finds itself in a time of great change. Swarco’s Michael Schuch talks to Adam Hill about connectivity, the increasing importance of the end user – and why you shouldn’t leave your core business behind
  • The problem of mass transit ridership post-Covid 19
    June 9, 2020
    Several pillars of Mobility as a Service – notably public transit, ride-share and micromobility – are under pressure as ridership plummets.
  • Why integrated traffic management needs a cohesive approach
    April 10, 2012
    Traffic control is increasingly being viewed as one essential element of a wider ‘system of systems’ – the smart city. Jason Barnes, Jon Masters and David Crawford report on latest ideas and efforts for making cities ‘smarter’ Virtually every element of the fabric and utilitarian operations that make urban areas tick can now be found somewhere in the mix that is the ‘smart city’ agenda. Ideas have expanded and projects pursued in different directions as the rhetoric on making cities ‘smarter’ has grown. App