Skip to main content

Counting on safety

The European Transport Safety Council is calling for the mandatory fitting of intelligent seat belt reminders, intelligent speed assistance and automatic lane departure warnings to all new vehicles sold in the EU. These are the latest of many systems introduced to improve vehicle safety and while technology can combat specific hazards, technology alone is not the answer. If it was, then the 60% of those killed in EU motorway collisions that were not wearing a seat belt, would have been wearing one and may h
April 29, 2015 Read time: 2 mins

The European Transport Safety Council is calling for the mandatory fitting of intelligent seat belt reminders, intelligent speed assistance and automatic lane departure warnings to all new vehicles sold in the EU. These are the latest of many systems introduced to improve vehicle safety and while technology can combat specific hazards, technology alone is not the answer. If it was, then the 60% of those killed in EU motorway collisions that were not wearing a seat belt, would have been wearing one and may have survived.

The technology was there, the humans just ignored it.

The most dangerous thing to tell any driver is that a vehicle is ‘safe’. To do so diminishes (or even removes) any concept that drivers will suffer the consequences of their own shortcomings and instead replaces it with a belief that ‘the car will protect me from me’.

So what might young, inexperienced or inattentive drivers make of an automatic lane departure warning system? Will they say ‘it reminds me to use the indicators’ or is it more likely they will think ‘it makes texting while driving safe because it alerts me when I wander out of the lane’.

Pedestrians, cyclists and other road users beware.

Every additional vehicle safety feature removes the driver further from reality, lulling them into a false sense of security that the systems cannot possibly deliver.

Collectively they send out the message: ‘the car will compensate for the driver’s inadequacies’. But that need not be the case. Instead let it be known that the car will count and record the driver’s inadequacies - data that is already stored in the various onboard systems.

So if it is to require these additional safety features, let the EU also specify a counter on the dashboard which displays how many times ABS, lane keeping and other safety systems have been invoked. Not only would this remind drivers of their fallibility, it would also help pinpoint poor drivers be they inexperienced, elderly or simply reckless.

Now that really would promote road safety.

Related Content

  • Improving driver information, making in-vehicle systems a reality
    January 26, 2012
    Scott J. McCormick, president of the Connected Vehicle Trade Association, considers what we have to do next to make the more widespread deployment of automotive telematics a reality
  • Adaptive cruise control would suppress traffic instability
    March 20, 2014
    Professor Berthold Horn of Massachusetts Institute of Technology believes a modified adaptive cruise control could mitigate phantom traffic jamsthat occur for no apparent reason. The phenomenon of the phantom traffic jam is all too common: they appear for no apparent reason and, having caused frustrating delays for all travelers, evaporate for an equally mystical reason. Phantom traffic jams usually occur on busy highways and often take the form of repeatedly stopping and then accelerating up to near the
  • ETSC report: ‘Urgent action needed’ on VRU deaths
    February 4, 2020
    Vulnerable road users (VRUs) such as cyclists and pedestrians are still at significant risk of injury on Europe’s roads, according to new research.
  • Ertico weaves tunnel visions into the ‘big picture’
    April 7, 2017
    As he takes the wheel at Ertico - ITS Europe, Jacob Bangsgaard talks to ITS International about the challenges and opportunities facing the organisation and the ITS industry. Ertico - ITS Europe’s new CEO, Jacob Bangsgaard, is no stranger to the organisation having spent five years there before moving to the FIA (Federation Internationale de l’Automobile) in 2006. Four years later he became director general of the FIA’s Region I (EMEA), which represents more than 100 mobility clubs, and in 2012 he joined Er