Skip to main content

Counting on safety

The European Transport Safety Council is calling for the mandatory fitting of intelligent seat belt reminders, intelligent speed assistance and automatic lane departure warnings to all new vehicles sold in the EU. These are the latest of many systems introduced to improve vehicle safety and while technology can combat specific hazards, technology alone is not the answer. If it was, then the 60% of those killed in EU motorway collisions that were not wearing a seat belt, would have been wearing one and may h
April 29, 2015 Read time: 2 mins

The European Transport Safety Council is calling for the mandatory fitting of intelligent seat belt reminders, intelligent speed assistance and automatic lane departure warnings to all new vehicles sold in the EU. These are the latest of many systems introduced to improve vehicle safety and while technology can combat specific hazards, technology alone is not the answer. If it was, then the 60% of those killed in EU motorway collisions that were not wearing a seat belt, would have been wearing one and may have survived.

The technology was there, the humans just ignored it.

The most dangerous thing to tell any driver is that a vehicle is ‘safe’. To do so diminishes (or even removes) any concept that drivers will suffer the consequences of their own shortcomings and instead replaces it with a belief that ‘the car will protect me from me’.

So what might young, inexperienced or inattentive drivers make of an automatic lane departure warning system? Will they say ‘it reminds me to use the indicators’ or is it more likely they will think ‘it makes texting while driving safe because it alerts me when I wander out of the lane’.

Pedestrians, cyclists and other road users beware.

Every additional vehicle safety feature removes the driver further from reality, lulling them into a false sense of security that the systems cannot possibly deliver.

Collectively they send out the message: ‘the car will compensate for the driver’s inadequacies’. But that need not be the case. Instead let it be known that the car will count and record the driver’s inadequacies - data that is already stored in the various onboard systems.

So if it is to require these additional safety features, let the EU also specify a counter on the dashboard which displays how many times ABS, lane keeping and other safety systems have been invoked. Not only would this remind drivers of their fallibility, it would also help pinpoint poor drivers be they inexperienced, elderly or simply reckless.

Now that really would promote road safety.

Related Content

  • Caltrans takes the long view of transport
    October 21, 2016
    Caltrans’ Malcolm Dougherty took time out of his schedule at ITS America 2016 in San Jose to talk to ITS International about current and future challenges. As director of California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) since mid-2012, many would say that Malcolm Dougherty has one of the best jobs in transportation. Caltrans is one of the most progressive and innovative transport authorities, implementing policies to encourage cycling, piloting new
  • Safelane automates work zone perimeter guarding
    June 12, 2015
    The safety of workers during road closures and working alongside, or above, live lanes is becoming an automated process. Ten workers suffered major injuries while working on or near motorways and major A roads in England in 2013, and between 2009 and 2013 eight had been killed. It was against that background that the first commercial application Safelane, the automated traffic management system designed to detect work zone incursions, was carried out during the temporary closure of a motorway.
  • Cooperative systems and privacy not mutually exclusive
    February 1, 2012
    Are co-operative systems and personal privacy mutually exclusive? Not necessarily, says Neil Hoose. But the more advanced the application, the greater the concession of privacy may have to become. ITS Stockholm in 2009 and the Cooperative Mobility Showcase event which took place alongside Intertraffic in Amsterdam in March this year both featured live, on-street demonstrations of safety and driver information applications that used Vehicle-to-Infrastructure (V2I) and Vehicle-to-Vehicle (V2V) communications,
  • Cooperative systems and privacy not mutually exclusive
    February 6, 2012
    Are co-operative systems and personal privacy mutually exclusive? Not necessarily, says Neil Hoose. But the more advanced the application, the greater the concession of privacy may have to become