Skip to main content

Counting on safety

The European Transport Safety Council is calling for the mandatory fitting of intelligent seat belt reminders, intelligent speed assistance and automatic lane departure warnings to all new vehicles sold in the EU. These are the latest of many systems introduced to improve vehicle safety and while technology can combat specific hazards, technology alone is not the answer. If it was, then the 60% of those killed in EU motorway collisions that were not wearing a seat belt, would have been wearing one and may h
April 29, 2015 Read time: 2 mins

The European Transport Safety Council is calling for the mandatory fitting of intelligent seat belt reminders, intelligent speed assistance and automatic lane departure warnings to all new vehicles sold in the EU. These are the latest of many systems introduced to improve vehicle safety and while technology can combat specific hazards, technology alone is not the answer. If it was, then the 60% of those killed in EU motorway collisions that were not wearing a seat belt, would have been wearing one and may have survived.

The technology was there, the humans just ignored it.

The most dangerous thing to tell any driver is that a vehicle is ‘safe’. To do so diminishes (or even removes) any concept that drivers will suffer the consequences of their own shortcomings and instead replaces it with a belief that ‘the car will protect me from me’.

So what might young, inexperienced or inattentive drivers make of an automatic lane departure warning system? Will they say ‘it reminds me to use the indicators’ or is it more likely they will think ‘it makes texting while driving safe because it alerts me when I wander out of the lane’.

Pedestrians, cyclists and other road users beware.

Every additional vehicle safety feature removes the driver further from reality, lulling them into a false sense of security that the systems cannot possibly deliver.

Collectively they send out the message: ‘the car will compensate for the driver’s inadequacies’. But that need not be the case. Instead let it be known that the car will count and record the driver’s inadequacies - data that is already stored in the various onboard systems.

So if it is to require these additional safety features, let the EU also specify a counter on the dashboard which displays how many times ABS, lane keeping and other safety systems have been invoked. Not only would this remind drivers of their fallibility, it would also help pinpoint poor drivers be they inexperienced, elderly or simply reckless.

Now that really would promote road safety.

Related Content

  • Automated vehicles need ‘driving tests’
    April 26, 2016
    European Union rules on safety approvals for new cars will need to be revised to include ‘driving tests’ for automated and fully-autonomous vehicles according to a new report from the European Transport Safety Council (ETSC). ETSC says the EU is far from answering the many research and regulatory questions that must be considered before automated and autonomous vehicles can be put on sale. The report says the priority must be ensuring that the promised safety benefits are delivered in real world driving.
  • Xerox automates HOV/HOT enforcement
    May 27, 2014
    Counting the number of people in a vehicle has always been a manual task, but now Xerox has developed a real-time system to automate the process. Xerox has introduced an automated system that determines the number of passengers in a vehicle, enabling authorities to detect non-qualifying drivers using the High Occupancy Vehicle (HOV) and High Occupancy Toll (HOT) lanes. Traditionally HOV/HOT enforcement has entailed local police visually confirming each vehicle has the required number of occupants and chasin
  • Brigade steals a march on camera market
    March 8, 2024
    AI Connected Dashcam is dual camera system using AI tech to provide event warnings
  • Legalities of in-vehicle systems and cooperative infrastructures
    February 1, 2012
    Paul Laurenza of Dykema Gossett PLLC discusses the paths which lawmakers may go down on the route to making in-vehicle systems and cooperative infrastructures a reality. The question of whether or not to mandate in-vehicle systems for safety and other applications is a vexed one. There is a presumption on some parts that going down the road of forcing systems' fitment is somehow too domineering or restricting. Others would argue that it is the only realistic way of ensuring that systems achieve widespread d