Skip to main content

Corruption corrodes confidence as ITS battles to improve safety

News items and articles in this issue illustrate the highs and lows of ITS and the dilemma inherent in enforcement application. An IIHS report showing that speed cameras change motorists' behaviour beyond the immediate vicinity of the installations is further evidence of the positive influence the technology can have, however the guilty plea in the Chicago red light corruption case serves to undermine the entire concept.
October 13, 2015 Read time: 3 mins

News items and articles in this issue illustrate the highs and lows of ITS and the dilemma inherent in enforcement application.  An IIHS report showing that speed cameras change motorists’ behaviour beyond the immediate vicinity of the installations is further evidence of the positive influence the technology can have, however the guilty plea in the Chicago red light corruption case serves to undermine the entire concept.

In most parts of the world, enforcement is undertaken by consent of the people, which can only happen when the people feel they are being treated fairly - as summed up by the famous quote: “Not only must Justice be done; it must also be seen to be done.” In this respect any corruption, regardless of whether the misdemeanour is connected to the application of the law to motorists, will be portrayed by naysayers as evidence that enforcement systems are only installed to ‘tax motorists’.

Yet it is a sad fact that motor vehicles remain the world’s most prolific killing machine. World Health Organisation statistics show that every year 1.3 million people die from injuries they receive while travelling on or beside the road.

It is against this background that regulatory authorities have to decide whether or not to implement roadside drug testing of motorists and if so how shat should be done. This requires balancing the right of motorists to go about their business without let or hindrance, against the public’s right not be put at risk by incapacitated drivers.

How many deaths and serious injuries are the result of drug-impaired drivers is currently unknowable but with the increasing use of roadside testing, hard evidence is starting to emerge - and it is not encouraging. Although fewer people take drugs than consume alcohol, there is evidence that users are more likely to drive after taking drugs than their counterparts are after having too much to drink. This may be precisely because their chances of getting caught for drug-driving have been much lower than if they were over the alcohol limit.

So it is to be hoped that, as the IIHS study has shown with speeding, the fear of getting caught will change drug-users’ willingness to drive and alert those using prescribed medication of the potential for impairment in their driving ability.

However, such self-restraint will only happen if the police are given the equipment and power to test those they believe to be impaired, or even on a random basis.

But support for such policies requires that the public believe road and enforcement authorities are doing an honest job and without fear or favour.

That sets a high standard but it is one that has to be met if enforcement by consent is to prevail. 

Related Content

  • April 13, 2017
    New research says anti-drunk driving campaigns should include pedestrians, cyclists
    State Highway Safety Offices and their partners should broaden their anti-drunk driving campaigns to encourage cyclists and pedestrians to consider safer transportation alternatives after heavy drinking. The US Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS) has reported that the ratios of fatally injured alcohol-impaired bicyclists and pedestrians has not fallen as dramatically as the proportion of impaired motor vehicle drivers killed and this remains a significant problem. In fact more than one-third o
  • February 17, 2020
    AAA report: caught red-handed
    Using published crash statistics, the AAA Foundation for Traffic Safety’s report found that 939 people were killed in red-light running crashes in 2017 – a rise of 28% since 2012. Moreover, more than a quarter (28%) of crash deaths at signalised intersections “are the result of a driver running through a red light”.
  • March 17, 2017
    Europe’s road safety gains have stagnated EU
    Europe will fail to meet its road death targets as enforcement budgets are slashed and drivers face an epidemic of distractions. The European Union will not achieve its aim of halving the number of people killed on its roads each year by 2020, delegates to Tispol’s (the organisation of European traffic police) annual conference in Manchester were told. “The target will be missed because there was only a 17% decrease in road fatalities across Europe between 2010 and 2015 when [the rate of reduction] should h
  • April 25, 2012
    China aims to boost road safety with drink driving crackdown
    The authorities in China claim that tough new laws against drink driving are already having a major benefit for road safety, according to the official news agency Xinhua. The latest official statistics reveal a sharp drop in road accidents caused by drink driving over a recent long holiday weekend. The newly amended law imposes harsher punishments on drunk drivers, with police also taking a tough line on enforcement.