Skip to main content

A change of tack

For some time, it has been evident that the quickening pace of technological advancement has been outpacing the ability of legislators to introduce new laws and amend existing legislation. One example was, apparently, UK legislation specifying that vehicles are fitted with filament lights which was drafted to outlaw acetylene lamps but a century later delayed the introduction of LED technology on vehicles.
December 18, 2017 Read time: 2 mins
For some time, it has been evident that the quickening pace of technological advancement has been outpacing the ability of legislators to introduce new laws and amend existing legislation. One example was, apparently, UK legislation specifying that vehicles are fitted with filament lights which was drafted to outlaw acetylene lamps but a century later delayed the introduction of LED technology on vehicles.


To overcome unintended legislative hurdles and plug exploitable gaps, most legal systems have become an unwieldy colossus of documentation with clauses and sub-clauses.

Therefore the process of amending legislation or introducing new laws has become extremely complex and slow, causing widespread frustration. Indeed, some companies have adopted a ‘catch me if you can’ attitude; simply putting new products and services onto the market without bothering about the legal niceties.

It has become evident that legislators can no longer second-guess technological developments and the more detailed the legislation, the more holes it creates. What is needed is to move from a system where everything is considered legal unless it is specifically banned, to a process whereby law makers lay out the aims and guiding principles of the legislation. Companies, authorities and individuals will then be held accountable to the letter, and spirit, of the legislation.

While this approach would facilitate the introduction of new technologies and services, it would also have other implications which would be welcomed by many – but not necessarily the suppliers. For instance, instead of increasing penalties for drivers using mobile phones, legislators should say that by a certain deadline on all new phones it should not be possible for drivers to read or send texts (and arguably phone calls) while moving. All methods of circumventing that legislation would be against the spirit of the law (and therefore illegal) while the suppliers would be free to devise how they wished to comply with those requirements.

The safety gain would be immense, enforcement costs would be virtually zero and other developments would not be prohibited. To me, that sounds like a win-win situation.

Related Content

  • EVR and how best to do it
    June 10, 2015
    Kapsch TrafficCom’s Christoph Amlacher explains that the key to successful Electronic Vehicle Registration is to consider a deployment in its entirety — including enforcement. Electronic Vehicle Registration (EVR) shares much in common with large-scale city congestion charging, in that its benefits are numerous and obvious, and it has been a topic of lively discussion for a decade and more. Despite such manifest advantages and widespread interest, this has failed to translate into numerous large-scale deplo
  • The effectiveness of roads policing
    March 6, 2015
    The Joint Roads Policing Unit of Thames Valley Police and Hampshire Constabulary in the UK commissioned the Transport Research laboratory (TRL) to evaluate the effectiveness of their roads policing strategy in terms of reducing the number of people killed and seriously injured in road collisions. The focus was on the fatal four causes of collisions: speeding, drink-driving, not wearing a seat belt and drivers using mobile phones. TRL carried out a detailed literature review, in-depth review and analysis of
  • TM 2.0 boost TMC data feed and driver influence
    November 15, 2017
    TM 2.0 views connected vehicles and V2I as two-way communications channels, benefitting traffic management and drivers, as Alan Dron discovers. As connected vehicles are progressively rolled out there will come a point at which traffic managers and traffic management centres (TMCs) will have to gear up to cope with a rapidly-evolving road scenario. The TM 2.0 Platform (see box) is promoting a concept of new-generation traffic management (which carries the same TM 2.0 title) and is studying how future T
  • The rise and rise of robo-car
    July 23, 2019
    When it comes to driverless cars, there are many variables – but one thing is for certain: autonomous driving will have a significant impact on vehicle design, says Andreas Herrmann The transition to autonomous vehicles (AVs) means that many of the factors which have shaped automotive design for the past 130 years no longer apply. At present, the design of a car is largely determined by the anticipated direction of travel: the car’s silhouette immediately shows where the front and back are. Driverless ve