Skip to main content

A Change of Perspective

Today’s legislators and the public sector in general are often berated for holding back innovation, for delaying the introduction of new products or services and being too slow in revising legislation. In the transport sector, Mobility as a Service (MaaS) is perhaps the ultimate disrupter as it cuts across all travel modes and to make it work will require legislative changes, the cooperation of all transport operators and the release of certain data.
December 11, 2017 Read time: 2 mins
Today’s legislators and the public sector in general are often berated for holding back innovation, for delaying the introduction of new products or services and being too slow in revising legislation. In the transport sector, Mobility as a Service (MaaS) is perhaps the ultimate disrupter as it cuts across all travel modes and to make it work will require legislative changes, the cooperation of all transport operators and the release of certain data.


Yet, as you will read, our MaaS Market Conference was told time and again that resistance to change often comes from within – be that from separated and siloed transport modes, individual transport operators or even commercial operations. But the travelling public does not subscribe to this neatly segregated and isolated world, they just want to move from A to B by the easiest and most convenient way possible – as illustrated by the rise of taxi-hailing apps such as Uber.

With the ‘convenience’ bar now raised, there is no going back. But in todays congested cities not everybody can go everywhere in a taxi or their private car, so public transport has to raise its game to meet peoples’ new expectation levels and the only way to do this is by using multi-modal solutions.

Add to that mix the seemingly endless increase in the urban population and it is clear that ‘business as usual’ is no longer an option for city authorities and national governments. Either transport authorities climb out of their siloes and focus on traveller convenience or they will be side-lined by the new service providers.

Demolishing those siloes now will be disruptive and potentially even painful in the short-term but the resulting organisations will be far better placed to provide for, and administer, the transport systems people want today and will demand tomorrow.

Related Content

  • Opinion: Have we missed our moment to reinvent mass transport?
    September 16, 2020
    We need to focus on providing better mass transportation services during the COVID-19 pandemic - and work out how to help travellers to rapidly regain confidence in using them as lockdowns end
  • Q&A: ‘It’s time to be honest about micromobility’
    April 10, 2025
    The micromobility market is in flux, cities are hitting back: so how can bike- and scooter-share providers move forward in a way that satisfies everyone? Adam Hill finds out…
  • Florida’s Altamonte Springs uses Uber pilot program with Uber to expand transportation coverage
    April 5, 2017
    To Uber or Not to Uber, that is the question cities must answer as they consider the pros and cons of inviting private transportation service providers to fill transportation gaps. Back in 1999, Frank Martz, city manager of Altamonte Springs, Florida, had an idea to expand transportation services to areas not covered by the local bus company.
  • Virginia Tech reveals vested interest
    May 9, 2019
    New ITS systems on either side of the Atlantic – such as an intriguing piece of connected clothing – aim to reduce the casualty toll among road maintenance personnel, says Alan Dron t’s not a lot of fun working on road maintenance or road construction worksites. By definition, you’re out in all weathers. You’re not popular with motorists, who blame you for hold-ups. It’s frequently physically arduous. And, worst of all, the sector has an unenviable record of injuries - even fatalities. Often working jus