Skip to main content

A Change of Perspective

Today’s legislators and the public sector in general are often berated for holding back innovation, for delaying the introduction of new products or services and being too slow in revising legislation. In the transport sector, Mobility as a Service (MaaS) is perhaps the ultimate disrupter as it cuts across all travel modes and to make it work will require legislative changes, the cooperation of all transport operators and the release of certain data.
December 11, 2017 Read time: 2 mins
Today’s legislators and the public sector in general are often berated for holding back innovation, for delaying the introduction of new products or services and being too slow in revising legislation. In the transport sector, Mobility as a Service (MaaS) is perhaps the ultimate disrupter as it cuts across all travel modes and to make it work will require legislative changes, the cooperation of all transport operators and the release of certain data.


Yet, as you will read, our MaaS Market Conference was told time and again that resistance to change often comes from within – be that from separated and siloed transport modes, individual transport operators or even commercial operations. But the travelling public does not subscribe to this neatly segregated and isolated world, they just want to move from A to B by the easiest and most convenient way possible – as illustrated by the rise of taxi-hailing apps such as Uber.

With the ‘convenience’ bar now raised, there is no going back. But in todays congested cities not everybody can go everywhere in a taxi or their private car, so public transport has to raise its game to meet peoples’ new expectation levels and the only way to do this is by using multi-modal solutions.

Add to that mix the seemingly endless increase in the urban population and it is clear that ‘business as usual’ is no longer an option for city authorities and national governments. Either transport authorities climb out of their siloes and focus on traveller convenience or they will be side-lined by the new service providers.

Demolishing those siloes now will be disruptive and potentially even painful in the short-term but the resulting organisations will be far better placed to provide for, and administer, the transport systems people want today and will demand tomorrow.

Related Content

  • Singapore plans changes to transit system
    June 13, 2018
    Singapore has the third-highest population density in the world and the numbers are continuing to grow. The government knows that transit is vital: David Crawford investigates the city state’s Smart Nation strategy. Transport is the most important of the five domains identified as the pillars of Singapore's far-reaching Smart Nation strategy, launched in November 2014 by prime minister Lee Hsien Loong with the aim of reaching fulfilment by 2024. Roads account for 12% of the island republic's 719km2 land ar
  • Variable message signs continue to deliver travel information
    February 2, 2012
    Arguably the 'face' of ITS, variable message signs are far from being a passing solution
  • The rise of V2X: it’s time for ITS to put up the shields in cyberspace
    May 14, 2018
    Traffic management has largely been shielded from the sort of malicious hacking that is commonplace in other industries – but with billions of connected devices in the world it won’t stay that way, warn internet experts Keith Golden and Brandon Johnson. Traditionally isolated from networks and the internet over most of its history, the traffic management industry has largely been shielded from malicious hacking and system intrusion that have become commonplace in other industries. However, as the rate of
  • The free and open internet is dead
    June 25, 2018
    A key US vote may have changed what internet service providers are allowed to charge and how they restrict content: Joe Dysart explains why this has consequences for ITS companies. While most people were rushing around last December, grabbing last-minute gifts for the holidays, the US Federal Communications Commission (FCC) voted to drive a stake into the heart of the free and open internet. In a majority vote, the agency killed ‘net neutrality’ - a policy that has prevented your regional internet service